Announcement of Opportunity (AO) Satellite Mobilization for Biodiversity Action
On this page
- INTRODUCTION
- AO OBJECTIVE
- ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
- APPLICATIONS
- EVALUATION
- FUNDING
- FINANCING AGREEMENT
- FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
- APPENDIX A: EVALUATION CRITERIA
- APPENDIX B: Application Readiness Level (ARL) Descriptions
- APPENDIX C: Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) Target Definitions
Publication date:
Application due not later than .
- Eligible Recipients: For-profit and not-for-profit organizations established and operating in Canada, excluding academic institutions.
- Grants or Non-Repayable Contributions: Non-Repayable Contributions
- Maximum Amount per Project: up to $250,000 per project
- Maximum Timeframe of the Project: up to 24 mois
- Estimated Number of Agreements under the AO: 20
- Estimated Total Amount of the AO: $5,000,000
- Estimated Projects Start Date:
1 INTRODUCTION
Nature is core to Canada's identity. Not only is it a source of pride for Canadians, but it is also the foundation of our daily lives. Healthy, biodiverse ecosystems provide us with clear air, water, healthy soil, food, clothing, shelter, and medicine. It also protects us from floods, droughts, heatwaves, and much more. However, with biodiversity in ever increasing decline, the state of nature is posing a serious threat to human well-being and survival.
In an urgent call to action, key protection and restoration goals were defined at the international Conference of the Parties (COP-15) in , where nearly 200 countries adopted the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KM-GBF). Recently at COP-16, new actions were taken towards accelerating conservation and GBF implementation, notably through the establishment of dedicated funding channels and the adoption of a Program embedding meaningful contribution of indigenous peoples and local communities.
Voluntary and regulated nature-protecting initiatives are rapidly being deployed across the world at various scales, warranting monitoring and reporting processes to track progress from base states to improved scenarios. These often require a holistic, multi-source dataset and multi-temporal approach to address the panoply of activities undertaken as part of nature-based solutions, which are used to also tackle the climate change effects on biodiversity.
In this effort, Canada has charted an ambitious path forward, introducing its Nature Strategy in , stipulating a whole of society approach involving all Canadians and including Indigenous Peoples.
Nature Strategy | |
---|---|
Vision | Mission |
Nature is healthy, thriving, and sustaining and enriching the lives of current and future generations, and all Canadians have re-established their relationship with and are honoring their responsibilities to nature. | Working together to halt and reverse biodiversity loss and put nature on a path to recovery by taking urgent action to bring about transformative change for the benefit of all living things, including people. |
The Nature Strategy exposes six pillars that will ensure the path forward is inclusive, adaptable, and evidence-based:
- Recognizing, upholding, and implementing the rights of Indigenous Peoples and advancing reconciliation, as Indigenous Peoples are the original caretakers of the lands, waters, and ice.
- Ensuring a whole-of-government, whole-of-society approach to create policy coherence and draw on the strengths of every segment of society to build and deliver the solutions we need.
- Supporting a resilient economy and improving efficiency and certainty, as our prosperity is inherently linked to a healthy environment.
- Empowering on-the-ground action by reflecting regional differences, supporting communities, and adopting flexible community-based approaches.
- Using the best available science and knowledge, incorporating new insights, sharing information, and giving equal weight to western science and Indigenous Knowledge.
- Applying integrated, holistic approaches to ensure our actions are inclusive and transparent.
National actions are to rely on science-based data and traditional knowledges and satellite Earth Observations (SEO) forms part of the data collection and monitoring efforts that can support decision-making associated with the accomplishment of Nature Strategy goals. SEO-derived solutions (products and services) can play an integral part in better understanding the dynamics pertaining to biodiversity's five main threats (climate change, pollution, invasive alien species, over-consumption, and habitat destruction) and in accompanying stakeholders' sustainable stewardship of nature.
This Announcement of Opportunity (AO), open to Canadian for-profit and not-for-profit organizations, is being offered through the smartEarth framework Enabler Track as a capacity development initiative, and is consistent with the terms and conditions of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) Class Grant and Contribution Program to Support Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology – Research Component (the G&C Program).
smartEarth aims to:
- Foster networking and collaboration among Canadian actors, provide directions to facilitate access to Canadian and world sources of free and open space data; reach out to new users; and, to maintain an open dialogue with all Canadian stakeholders.
- Accelerate innovation in the delivery of new and improved space-based applications yielding solutions that respond more quickly and creatively to opportunities and priorities of importance to Canada.
- Stimulate uptake of spaceborne data and signals to deliver on national priorities including the monitoring of climate variable.
- Develop capacities within industry and research communities, enhancing the competitiveness of Canadian industry and generating growth and economic benefits for Canadians.
Applicants are asked to read the following AO thoroughly before submitting their applications. This AO was prepared to help applicants complete the application process, and outlines key elements, including mandatory criteria for eligibility, details on eligible projects and the selection process. In the event of any discrepancies between this AO and the individual funding agreements governing a project, the latter document(s) will take precedence.
2 AO OBJECTIVE
The 2030 Nature Strategy highlights the importance of filling critical knowledge gaps and undertaking priority assessments of ecosystems and biodiversity with a restoration and conservation objective. Satellite Earth Observation (SEO) has contributed to several solutions pertaining to these and can play an ongoing and critical role in the realization of the goals, targets and indicators included in the strategy.
As such, the objectives of this AO are:
- To support the development of space-based solutions in the form of innovative applications (new applications, data products, models/prototypes, methodologies, solutions, tools, systems, processes, technologies, services, teaching/learning methods and education material) to meet today's biodiversity challenges resulting in a better future for all Canadians.
- To leverage emerging opportunities such as digital technologies and capabilities (for example, cloud computing, machine learning, deep learning, and artificial intelligence), as well as the growing sources of satellite remote sensing/Earth observation data to maximize Canada's contribution to biodiversity action.
- To advance knowledge and capacity for the downstream community interested in remote sensing and/or Earth observation. In this regard, we encourage collaboration with other stakeholders, including but not limited to, post-secondary institutions, Canadian space industry, other government departments, international partners, and Indigenous People.
SEO application advancements will help position Canadian stakeholders to support the Government of Canada in delivering on its engagement regarding the biodiversity crisis, orient policies, and support services to Canadians. Below are the 23 targets of the Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) which will help safeguard biodiversity, restore ecosystems, and reduce threats to nature. For descriptions of these targets, please refer to Annex C.

Overview of the 23 targets of the Global Biodiversity Framework - Text version
Long description:
This figure provides a high-level visual overview of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework's (KMGBF) three themes and the targets that fall under each of those themes. It consists of a circle divided into three parts, each part representing one of the three themes, which are then subdivided into the relevant targets (23 total) that fall under the theme in question.
The breakdown is as follows:
Theme 1 - Reducing threats to biodiversity. Targets 1 to 8 fall under this theme:
- Spatial planning and effective management,
- Ecosystem restoration,
- Protected and conserved areas (30x30),
- Species recovery,
- Exploitation of species / wild species harvesting, use, and trade,
- Invasive alien species,
- Pollution and biodiversity, and
- Climate change and biodiversity.
Theme 2 - Meeting people's needs through sustainable use and benefit-sharing. Targets 9 to 13 fall under this theme:
- Sustainable use and management of wild species,
- Sustainable management in key productive sectors,
- Ecosystem services and functions,
- Urban blue and green spaces, and
- Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing.
Theme 3 - Tools and solutions for implementation and mainstreaming. Targets 14 to 23 fall under this theme:
- Mainstreaming of biodiversity values,
- Business' role,
- Sustainable consumption,
- Biosafety / biotechnology,
- Negative and positive incentives,
- Resource mobilization (financial resources),
- Capacity building (other resources for implementation),
- Knowledge sharing,
- Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples, women/girls, youth/children, persons with disabilities, and environmental human rights defenders in decision making, and
- Gender equality.
An underlying goal of this AO is to take an existing level of capability in the marketplace where gaps or opportunities may occur and to move it up in level(s) on the Application Readiness Level (ARL) scale, resulting in the improvement of Canadian organization's competitiveness capabilities and service offerings.
The ARL system that has been created for the smartEarth context is shown below. For detailed descriptions of the ARL scale, please refer to Annex B.

SmartEarth Application Readiness Level Scale, with nine progressive levels, ranging foundational concept to commercialization - Text version
Long description:
SmartEarth Application Readiness Level (ARL) Scale, with nine progressive levels, ranging foundational concept to commercialization.
- Facilitate and Implement (Mature Levels to provide solution)
- Demonstrate and Validate (Mid-Levels to confirm the concept)
- Explore and Create (Early Levels to identify the approach options)
Progressive ARL Advancement
- Ready-to-Use Products and Services (Commercialization)
- Practical Implementation (Operational Use)
- Refined Application Solution (tailored Solution)
- Demonstration in the Application Environment (Confirmation)
- Validation in the Application Context (Concept Feasibility)
- Concept Development (Proof of Concept)
- Selection of Preferred Approach (Logic Based)
- Consideration of Innovative Concepts (State-of-the-Art)
- Identification of the Application (Foundational Concept)
3 ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
In this section 3
3.1 Eligible Recipients
To be eligible under this AO, recipients must meet the eligibility criteria or one of the eligibility criteria as follows:
- For-profit organizations established and operating in Canada.
- Not-for-profit organizations established and operating in Canada.
3.2 Eligible Projects
To be eligible for CSA funding, projects must consist of one (principal) or more of the following research and development activities (R&D) of interest to Canada:
- Advancing scientific knowledge of ecosystems (applied R&D) by refining the use of satellite Earth Observation technologies and integrating with other information systems. For example, to better understand ecosystems/biomes to reduce associated threats and optimize restoration or sustainable stewardship (e.g., development or refinement of science-based data products, Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) and indicators, models/prototypes, inter-disciplinary systems, etc.).
- Streamlining processes and standardization capabilities related to EO-based Monitoring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) methods and processes associated with nature-based projects and due diligence. These could be related to baselining and environmental assessment activities for biodiversity protection/enhancement, within broader sustainable operations, disclosures, and benefit-sharing contexts.
- Developing user-friendly tools and solutions for mainstreaming SEO-integrated information for biodiversity protection and nature-positive decision-making. This could include incorporating SEO into new or existing ways, drawing on methods that leverage stakeholders' capacities to support biodiversity agendas in multiple ways (e.g., citizen science applications, dissemination platforms, educational materials, awareness kits, etc.).
To be eligible, the activities outlined in the project must address one or more of the 23 GBF targets introduced in Section 2 and further described in Appendix C. The Nature Strategy target(s) must be clearly stated and justified within the proposal.
Furthermore, the activities outlined in the project must also align with the ARL ladder as described in Section 2 and further described in Appendix B. The applicant should clearly identify, in the proposal, the current state-of-the-art and its corresponding ARL, as well as the target ARL the project intends to achieve. The maximum level attainable under this AO is ARL 7.
All development phases necessary for a project are eligible. Any logical breakdown or combination of these phases can constitute a funded project under this AO. However, breaking down a project into numerous phases submitted as distinct proposals to obtain more than the maximum contribution under this AO is not allowed. Furthermore, the completion of a funded phase does not automatically guarantee future funding of the remaining phases.
The potential scope of the proposed project concept is broad and open in terms of the data, technologies and applications that may be considered, provided that the project represents a tangible advancement in the ARL ladder and bridges a gap in knowledge and information that has the potential of improving the applicant's capabilities.
Any sources of satellite EO data may be proposed, many of which can be found in the open marketplace. This includes a variety of optical and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) imagery, as well as non-image data and other relayed data. It is the responsibility of the applicant to locate theses sources based on the objective of their proposed project and to obtain all of the data to be used in the project from commercial or public sites, such as, but not limited to, the Earth Observation Data Management System (EODMS) hosted by NRCAN. If costs are to be incurred in acquiring EO imagery or other data type, the applicant should include these costs in their financial bids to be commensurate with project value. For the RADARSAT Constellation Mission (RCM), archived data 16m and coarser over land below 70 degrees of latitude is open to public. However, access to high resolution RCM archive data above 70 degrees of latitude and requires applicants to be a vetted user. Access to RCM data | Canadian Space Agency (asc-csa.gc.ca)
Please note:
- Projects whose primary objectives are to develop the capacity for space technology are not eligible for this AO.
- A project may not be eligible for funding if the applicant was previously awarded funding by the CSA for a similar project that is underway. If the proposed project is directly or indirectly related to a project that was previously funded through a CSA AO or Request for Proposal (RFP), the applicant may still be eligible for funding if the proposed project activities are complementary in nature and do not overlap with those of the previously funded project that is ongoing.
3.3 Links to CSA Priorities
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to at least one of the following CSA priorities listed below as per Canada's Strategy for Satellite Earth Observation.
- Ensure that satellite EO data is free, open, and accessible to maximize science, innovation, and economy.Harnessing satellite EO to address climate change and issues that matter to Canadians;
- Strengthening the delivery of critical services to keep Canadians healthy, safe, and informed; and
- Inspiring skills and capacity development for the next generation.
Projects can also choose to contribute to one of the core elements of Canada's Space Strategy:
- Harness space to solve everyday challenges for Canadians.
- Position Canada's commercial space sector to help grow the economy and create the jobs of the future.
- Ensure Canada's leadership in acquiring and using space-based data to support science excellence, innovation, and economic growth.
Applicants are encouraged to propose projects that increase the representation and advancement of women and underrepresented groups in space sciences and engineering. The applicants must also demonstrate how their organization or team contributes to EDI (equity, diversity, and inclusion) and Indigenous People involvement as identified in Appendix A, Evaluation Criterion 2.3.
3.4 Links to the Class G&C Program Objectives
To be eligible, projects supported under this AO must contribute to the achievement of at least one of the following objectives:
- To support the development of science and technology relevant to the priorities of the Canadian Space Agency.
- To foster the continuing development of a critical mass of researchers and highly qualified people in Canada in areas relevant to the priorities of the Canadian Space Agency.
- To support the creation of new knowledge, scientific studies, and research related to space.
3.5 Links to the Class 3.5 Basic Research and Development (R&D) Definition
To be eligible, projects supported under the G&C Program must meet the CSA basic R&D definition:
"Any pre-commercial science and technology activities that are carried out to resolve unknowns regarding the feasibility of applications in the space sector."
Due diligence will be applied to determine whether projects are compliant with this definition.
4 APPLICATION
In this section 4
4.1 Required Documentation
The application must include the following:
- A completed original application form (Word, 88 KB) signed by the duly authorized representative with all documentation and information mentioned therein.
- The resumes of each team member responsible for managing the project and key technical personnel. The resumes should be limited to two pages with only information that is relevant to the application.
- Proof of incorporation or registration and a copy of the document(s) confirming the legal name of the applicant.
- Letters from other funding contributors confirming their contributions, if applicable.
- Letters of intent demonstrating interest in the outcomes of the project, if applicable.
- Letters of support, confirming participation to the project, if applicable.
- The Declaration on Confidentiality, Access to Information Act and Privacy Act form signed by the duly authorized representative (refer to the Applicant Declaration on Confidentiality, Access to Information Act and Privacy Act section included in the application form).
- For organizations in Quebec, M-30 Supporting Documentation form completed and signed by the duly authorized representative (refer to the M-30 form for organizations in Quebec included in the application form).
- Corporate plans and / or policies addressing equity, diversity, and inclusion in the workspace, if applicable.
The documents must be combined in a single PDF formatted file, in the same order as presented above with all security features disabled. The application form and supporting documents must be included in the file as a searchable PDF formatted document (PDF/A-1a format preferred). If there are any accessibility issues with the submitted PDF file, all consequences reside with the applicant.
It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application complies with all applicable federal, provincial/territorial, and municipal laws and regulations.
The applicant must keep one hard copy of all the original documents above. The CSA may require applicants who successfully passed the evaluation stage to send a hard copy of their complete application with the original documents.
Additional governing documents might be requested in a later phase of the evaluation process.
In a later phase of the evaluation process, the applicant's financial statements for the previous two fiscal years prior to the submission of this application and the most recent interim results will be requested. The reception of these statements by CSA is a precondition for producing a contribution agreement. It is not required to submit financial statements with this application.
Please note that incomplete applications will not be considered.
4.2 Submit the completed application electronically
The applicant is encouraged to submit their application electronically by following the steps below,
- Submit an account creation request using the Electronic Proposal Portal. Note that Google Chrome is the browser of choice for submissions. Supported browsers are Google Chrome and MS Edge.
- In the "Proposal title" field of the Electronic Proposal Portal, use the following formatting standard: SaMBA_smartEarth AO4_Name of Organization_Short Project Name (example: SaMBA_smartEarth AO4_ Name_ Optical Sensor Development).
- The "Applicant" section should contain the information for contact person listed in the application form.
- After the request has been submitted, the applicant will receive an email confirming the account creation. Applicants should expect three business days to receive the confirmation which will also include instructions (user guide) on how to access the platform. It is strongly recommended that the account creation request be submitted as early as possible.
- Using the temporary password assigned by the CSA, login to the secured portal to upload application documents.
- Please refer to the user guide for instructions on how to securely upload documents.
Please note:
- If technical issues related to account creation or to electronic submission cannot be resolved, applicants must submit their application by mail. Applicants are strongly encouraged to upload their complete application well before the submission deadline.
- Applications must be submitted (successfully uploaded) by the applicants no later than .
- The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all documents are uploaded on the Electronic Proposal Portal before the prescribed deadline.
- The CSA is not responsible for any delays under any circumstances and will reject any applications that are uploaded after the stipulated deadline.
- Applications hand-delivered to CSA will not be accepted.
- Applications sent by e-mail will not be accepted.
- Applicants are asked to not send their application both electronically and by mail or courier service. If multiple applications are submitted, only the latest valid version received will be considered.
4.3 How to submit an application by mail or using a recognized courier service
The applicant is encouraged to submit their application electronically following the instructions provided in Section 4.2 of the AO. However, if the applicant is unable to submit their application electronically, please communicate with smartearth.utiliterre@asc-csa.gc.ca as soon as possible but no later than to obtain instructions on how to submit a paper application by mail or using a recognized courier service.
Applications submitted by mail or using a recognized courier service must be received at the CSA no later than .
The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all required documents are received by the CSA before the prescribed deadline. The CSA is not responsible for any delays under any circumstances and will reject any applications that are received after the stipulated deadline.
4.4 Service Standards – Complete Applications
Applicants will be notified in writing of decisions regarding their application. Selected applications will be announced on the CSA website. The CSA has set the following service standards for processing times, acknowledgement of receipt, funding decisions and payment procedures.
Acknowledgement: The CSA's goal is to acknowledge receipt of proposals within 2 weeks of receiving the completed application package.
Decision: The CSA's goal is to respond to the proposal within 26 weeks of the AO's closing date and to send a contribution agreement for signature within 18 weeks after formal approval of the proposal.
Payment: The CSA's goal is to issue payment within 6 weeks of the successful fulfillment of the requirements outlined in the contribution agreement but is under no obligation to meet this deadline.
Compliance with these service standards is a shared responsibility. Applicants must submit all required documentation in a timely fashion. Service standards may vary by Announcement of Opportunity.
5 EVALUATION
In this section 5
5.1 Eligibility Criteria
- Represents an eligible recipient as defined in Section 3.1;
- Represents an eligible project as defined in Sections 3.2, 3.3, 3.4; and
- Meets program funding provisions Section 6.1.
5.2 Evaluation Criteria
The evaluation committee will evaluate eligible applications according to the following criteria. These are further described in Appendix A.
Criteria |
Overall maximum points for corresponding criterion |
Minimum threshold |
Sub-criterion |
Benchmark definition corresponding to point rating (1 to 4 points) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Excellent |
Good |
Average |
Poor |
||||
1. Innovation and market need |
35 |
17.5 |
1.1 Project scope |
5 |
3.75 |
2.5 |
1.25 |
1.2 Degree of Innovation |
20 |
15 |
10 |
5 |
|||
1.3 Market assessment |
10 |
7.5 |
5 |
2.5 |
|||
2. Project feasibility, resources, and risk assessment |
30 |
15 |
2.1 R&D methods and approach |
10 |
7.5 |
5 |
2.5 |
2.2 Feasibility |
10 |
7.5 |
5 |
2.5 |
|||
2.3 Resources |
5 |
3.75 |
2.5 |
1.25 |
|||
2.4 Risk assessment |
5 |
3.75 |
2.5 |
1.25 |
|||
3. Outcomes and benefits to Canada |
35 |
17.5 |
3.1 Benefits to Canada |
10 |
7.5 |
5 |
2.5 |
3.2 Competitive advantage and economic benefits |
15 |
11.25 |
7.5 |
3.75 |
|||
3.3 Expected outcomes and results (related to the contribution support) |
10 |
7.5 |
5 |
2.5 |
The minimum overall score required to be considered for funding is 50%.
The final score for each application will be the cumulative total for all criteria scores. The application scores will then be ranked, and contributions will be selected in ranked order.
5.3 Evaluation Process
Only applications that have passed the eligibility assessment listed in Section 5.1 will be given further consideration.
Once the eligibility criteria are confirmed, evaluators will assess the screened applications according to the criteria listed in Section 5.2. Applicants are encouraged to provide a detailed and clear description of how they meet each criterion.
Evaluators shall be internal experts in the fields relevant to the applications. If applicable, a multidisciplinary evaluation committee will be formed when applications from several different disciplines are competing to provide a uniform final score and ranking of proposals. Before a final decision is made, the CSA's Program Manager responsible for this AO may seek input and advice from other organizations, including (but not limited to) federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal government agencies and organizations.
Before a final decision is made, the CSA may conduct any consultation and seek advice or comments, including without limitation, from suppliers, researchers, financial institutions, accounting firms, financing organizations, credit rating organizations, government agencies and organizations, as it deems necessary to obtain any information useful for the evaluation of this application.
The results obtained in this AO could take into account certain factors in the final decision to grant funding, such as, but not limited to, the representativeness of the four designated groups (woman, Aboriginal person, disabled person or member of a visible minority), regional distribution, distribution between different organizations, etc. For more information on GBA +.
6 FUNDING
In this section 6
6.1 Available Funding and Duration
The maximum funding per contribution agreement to an eligible recipient is $250,000 over 24 months. The maximum funding per fiscal year per project is $47,500 for FY-, $132,500 for FY- and $70,000 for FY-. The total funding available under this AO is currently expected to be $5,000,000 over a maximum period of 24 months.
Approved proposals will be eligible for a total government (federal, provincial/territorial, and municipal) assistance of up to a maximum of 75% of total eligible project costs.
Each eligible recipient can be funded for 1 project(s) under this AO.
The number of projects under this AO will depend on funding availability. Submitted proposals should plan to be completed within a maximum period of twenty-four (24) months.
To determine the amount of funding to be allocated, consideration will be given to the availability of CSA funds, the total cost of the project, and the other confirmed sources of funding provided by other stakeholders and the applicant. Applicants must identify all sources of funding in their applications and confirm this information in a funding agreement if the project is selected for funding.
The CSA reserves the right to reject any proposals or reduce the amount of the contributions at its entire discretion.
6.2 Eligible Costs
Eligible costs are costs that are essential to carry out the Project, reasonable and directly related to the Project to achieve the expected results of the Project. The costs are to be incurred directly by the applicant. Incurred Costs means any expense made to carry out the Project related to an Eligible Cost which is due and payable. CSA will not contribute to costs Incurred prior to the coming into force of a Funding Agreement and after the Project Completion Date.
Eligible costs for under this AO can include:
- Acquisition or rental of equipment (not to exceed 20% of the total project eligible costs).
- Consultant services.
- Data acquisition.
- Data management.
- License and permit fees.
- Materials and supplies.
- Overhead (administrative) costs (not to exceed 15% of eligible costs).
- Salaries and benefits.
In no circumstance can the total amount of assistance from governmental sources (federal, provincial, territorial, and municipal) to the recipient exceed a certain percentage of the total project cost depending on the type of recipients.
Applicants must identify all sources of funding in their applications and confirm this information in a funding agreement if the project is selected for funding. Upon completion of a project, the recipient must also disclose all sources of funding.
7 FINANCING AGREEMENT
In this section 7
7.1 Agreement
Upon favorable review of the applications, CSA will send a Contribution agreement to the successful applicant. The Contribution agreement will outline the rights, roles, and obligations of each respective party. In the event of any discrepancies between this AO and a Contribution agreement between CSA and the recipient, the latter document will take precedence.
For greater clarity, no liability and no commitment or obligation exist on the part of the CSA to issue a Contribution payment to the applicant until a Contribution agreement is signed by both parties. Furthermore, any costs or expenses incurred or paid by the recipient prior to the execution of a written Contribution agreement by both parties are the sole responsibility of the applicant, and no liability exists on the part of the CSA.
7.2 Payments
Payments for contribution agreements will be made in accordance with the process and the reporting requirements described in the signed funding agreement. Upon notice of a successful application, the CSA will have no liability until a funding agreement is signed by both parties. Only eligible costs incurred after the funding agreement is signed and indicated in the agreement will be reimbursed.
7.3 Audit
The recipient of a funding agreement shall keep proper records of all documentation related to the funded project, for the duration of the project and for three (3) years after the completion date of the project, in the event of an audit. This documentation shall be available upon request.
7.4 Intellectual Property
All intellectual property developed by the recipient in the course of the project shall vest in the recipient. The recipient will undertake to protect all intellectual property he will possess, acquire, or develop during the project.
7.5 Organizations in Quebec
7.5.1 Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, CQLR c M-30
An organization in Quebec whose operations are partially or fully funded by the province of Quebec may be subject to the Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, CQLR c M-30.
Under Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of this Act, certain entities/organizations, as defined in the meaning of the Act, such as municipal bodies, school bodies, or public agencies, must obtain authorization from the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes (SQRC), as indicated by the Act, before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada, its departments or agencies, or a federal public agency.
Consequently, any entity that is subject to the Act is responsible for obtaining such authorization before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada.
Quebec applicants must complete, Section 8-A of the application form.
7.5.2 Loi sur la langue officielle et commune du Québec, le français
La Loi sur la langue officielle et commune du Québec, le français, changes section 55 of the Charter of the French Language and came into force on . Since that date, the conclusion of a G&C Agreement in English in Quebec is subject to the following conditions for the recipient to be bound by the Agreement:
- A French version of the Agreement must be produced including the Schedules and must be given to the recipient before the signing of the English version.
- The recipient must consent to signs the Agreement in English and continue communications in English thereafter.
- Only one Agreement must be signed, either the French or English version.
7.6 Performance Measurement
The CSA will ask the recipients to report on on various performance measurement indicators throughout the execution of the project. Examples include but are not limited to:
- Knowledge Creation
- Knowledge production (including publications)
- Presentations
- Intellectual property (including patents)
- Capacity Building
- Project's research team (including highly qualified personnel supported)
- Collaboration
- Partners' contributions
- Partnerships
- Multidisciplinary
7.7 Open Access Publications
In the event that publications result from the project, the CSA wishes to promote the dissemination of findings that results from the projects it funds as quickly and to the greatest number of people as possible. Improved access to scientific results not only allows scientists to use a broader range of resources and knowledge, but also improves research collaboration and coordination, strengthens citizen engagement, and supports the economy.
Thus, the CSA promotes the use of open access publication and archiving by recipients in order to facilitate the widest dissemination of findings that results from its funded projects. Thus, recipients are invited to publish, in a timely matter, their articles by using one of the following methods:
- Accessible online repository (institutional or disciplinary) so that the publication is freely accessible.
- Journal offering open access to articles.
It should be noted that these two methods are not mutually exclusive and that recipients are encouraged to use both.
Finally, the CSA wishes to receive, as a courtesy, a copy of the publications (if not freely accessible) or the hyperlink (if freely accessible) and its digital object identifier (DOI). These will be used to improve accessibility by including them in the CSA publications directory.
8 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ)
It is the responsibility of the applicants to obtain clarification of the requirements contained herein, if necessary, before submitting an application.
For any questions related to the AO, applicants shall use the following email address smartearth.utiliterre@asc-csa.gc.ca. Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the Frequently Asked Questions section of this AO. CSA will respond to questions received before 17:00 ET, 10 business days prior to the closing date.
Please note that email communication does not meet government data protection requirements.
-
Question 1: What types of expenditure can be eligible under Data acquisition costs and Data management fees?
Answer 1: Data acquisition costs: Can include, but not limited to, buying satellite imagery, data portal subscription fees. Data management fees: Can include, but is not limited to, data archiving, data processing and cloud computing fees.
-
Question 2: Where does my project fit in the ARL ladder?
Answer 2: This is a matter for the applicants to decide based on their understanding of the current state of the art with regards to the present level of knowledge and capabilities in the marketplace. The applicant should clearly identify the current state-of-the-art and its corresponding ARL, and then identify the target ARL that the research intends to achieve. Refer to Appendix B for detailed descriptions of the ARL scale.
-
Question 3: Is this a standalone funding opportunity or will there be others?
Answer 3: For the time being, this is a one-time funding opportunity.
-
Question 4: Is it preferable to use free data products and develop solutions, or paid satellite data products? Would there be any preference/requirement around the type of satellite data products used in a proposal?
Answer 4: Free data products or paid data products are both accepted. The type of satellite data products used is at the discretion of the research team.
-
Question 5: Can I use international data for my project, or must it be Canadian?
Answer 5: You can use any data; it does not need to be Canadian.
-
Question 6: Is there any format or length restrictions for team member CVs? Is the CSA CV template mandatory?
Answer 6: There are no restrictions on CV and the CSA CV template isn't mandatory.
-
Question 7: Can I use earth-based data for this Announcement of Opportunity?
Answer 7: You must use satellite data. However, other types of data can be used in parallel to supplement the project. Data eligible costs are only for satellite data.
-
Question 8: Can university research projects apply for this opportunity?
Answer 8: No, this AO is for for-profit and not-for-profit organizations.
-
Question 9: The CSA contribution is a maximum of $250,000.00, up to 75% of the total budget. Does that mean that for a project with a budget of $333.333.33, the CSA would contribute with $250,000?
Answer 9: Yes.
-
Question 10: Can an applicant lead a project while also participating as a partner in another consortium?
Answer 10: An eventual recipient could be a consortium, if it exits or is formed for a project and meets the eligibility criteria as follows: for-profit organizations established and operating in Canada, Not-for-profit organizations established and operating in Canada. However, each eligible recipient can only be funded for 1 project(s) under this AO. Therefore, there are two possibilities: 1. In the case of a consortium where all parties are equally responsible for the project outcome, the contribution agreement shall include all liable organizations. However, one of the recipients must be responsible and accountable for the integration and oversight of the project and must be the main point of contact with the CSA for the execution of the project including receiving payment. In this case, all organizations which are part of the consortium will not be able to submit another proposal for funding under this AO. 2. An alternative, depending on the intent and role of the organizations, would be to use their expertise as consultant services as stated in Section 6.2 "Eligible Costs". The nature of services to be acquired shall be set out in the proposal estimates and the consultant(s) must perform specific tasks. These services should not be a major share of the project. The CSA reserves the right to approve only a portion of the consultant fees submitted. In this case, the organization hired as a consultant, could also apply for another project, as long as the scope and objectives are different than the one for which they are providing consulting services.
-
Question 11: Are Sole proprietorships eligible for this AO?
Answer 11: Sole proprietorships are not eligible recipients for our grants and contribution program, and thus not admissible for this announcement of opportunity.
-
Question 12: Are provincial governments considered a not-for-profit organization?
Answer 12: No, provincial governments are not considered not-for-profit organizations.
-
Question 13: Are Community Colleges considered not-for-profit organizations?
Answer 13: No, Community Colleges are considered post-secondary institutions for the purpose of this call.
-
Question 14: How do we identify non-financial assistance from governments? For example, if a government employee works on the project and their time is considered in-kind, do we need to identify that or simply leave it out?
Answer 14: For in-kind contributions, please include it in the budget table and mention that it is an in-kind contribution. You can also identify them as a member of your team and mention that their contribution is in-kind there. Both places would be acceptable as well. It's important to mention their involvement as their expertise will have an impact on the project's feasibility.
-
Question 15: Our project is not intended to produce a commercial product but would generate new knowledge to support conservation efforts. Given the requirement for a market assessment and the focus on the ARL scale, we would like to clarify whether a non-commercial project of this nature would be eligible.
Answer 15: Non-commercial projects are accepted, as long as they fit somewhere on the ARL scale. For the market assessment, you will need to demonstrate the gap of knowledge you are trying to fill.
-
Question 16: Where is the partner form?
Answer 16: Please use the same application form as the applicant.
-
Question 17: Can we add extra pages to the limit provided?
Answer 17: We will allow 1 extra page to: 1) Section 3 (Project Definition), Question 4 (Detailed Project Definition), and 2) Section 4 (Evaluation Criteria), Criterion 2 (Project Feasibility, Resources, and Risk Assessment), Sub-section 2.1 (R&D methods and approach)
-
Question 18: Can a foreign organization be a consultant?
Answer 18: No. However, if it can be proven without any doubt, that the expertise is not available in Canada, an exception may be made. If not, then the foreign organization can provide in-kind contributions to the project.
9 APPENDIX A: EVALUATION CRITERIA
In this sectionAppendix A
Scoring
Applications must receive an overall minimum score of 50% to be considered for funding. Obtaining the highest score possible maximizes your chance of being selected to obtain financial support (see Section 6). Each criterion is further described below (and summarized in Section 5.2).
The final scores for each criterion will be determined as part of the consensus discussions by the evaluators. The applicant is advised to read Evaluation Criteria carefully when preparing the proposal.
1. Innovation and Market Need
This section is worth 35% of the total score and the minimum passing score is 17.5 points.
1.1 Project Scope
This criterion evaluates the scope and overall objective(s) of the proposed project, as well as its alignment to the strategic context highlighted in the introduction.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- Will the proposed project address the needs expressed in the national Nature Strategy?
- How does the project align with the selected eligible project type in section 3.2?
- Poor
The project scope and objective(s) are poorly defined and relevance to the strategic biodiversity conservation context is vague. (Score: 1.25 points)
- Average
The project scope and objective(s) are moderately defined; there is some attempt to link the project to needs tied to national biodiversity conservation priorities (Score: 2.5 points)
- Good
The project scope and objective(s) are well defined; the relevance to national biodiversity conservation priorities is clear and coherently expressed. (Score: 3.75 points)
- Excellent
The project scope and objective(s) are defined in significant detail; the project description provides highly relevant information pertaining to supporting the needs identified as national biodiversity conservation priorities. (Score: 5 points)
1.2 Degree of Innovation
This criterion evaluates the novelty associated with the application to be developed. Innovation can range from sustaining innovations that improve the performance of existing products (but does not create new markets) to disruptive innovations that offer an entirely different value proposition leading to the creation of new markets.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- What is the degree of innovation being proposed?
- How significant an advance would be made?
- Poor
There is little or no innovation being applied to the development of the proposed concepts, products, or know-how. (Score: 5 points)
- Average
A moderate level of innovation is being applied that will lead to improved performance of existing concepts, products and/or know-how. (Score: 10 points)
- Good
A high level of innovation is being applied that will lead to the development of leading-edge concepts, products and/or know-how. (Score: 15 points)
- Excellent
The level of innovation is transformative and will lead to the development of new concepts, products and/or know-how for new markets. (Score: 20 points)
1.3 Market Assessment
This criterion evaluates the applicant's understanding of the market needs associated with the proposed application. It includes a thorough analysis of market demand. This criterion also evaluates whether the proposal addresses the existence and number of competing alternatives on the market.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- Is the applicant aware of its current market?
- What are the factors that drive the demand for this application?
- Who are the potential customers for this application?
- Who are the potential competitors and what alternatives do they offer?
- Does the applicant have a strategy for competing with the alternative concepts?
- Poor
The applicant is not aware of the current market share pertaining to the application being developed and the many competitive alternatives already existing on the market. The proposal does not identify the factors that drive demand for this application or the relevant customers and competitors. The proposal does not present a strategy for competing with the alternatives. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Average
The applicant has limited knowledge of the current market pertaining to the application being developed. Some competitive alternatives exist in the market. The proposal identifies some of the factors that drive demand for this application but does not identify the relevant customers/stakeholders and competitors. The proposal provides an insufficient plan for competing with the alternatives. (Score: 5 points)
- Good
The applicant has a good understanding of the current market share pertaining to the application being developed. A limited number of competitive alternatives exist on the market. The proposal identifies an extensive list of factors that drive demand for this application and the relevant customers/stakeholders and competitors. The proposal provides a detailed plan for competing with those alternatives. (Score: 7.5 points)
- Excellent
The applicant demonstrates an in-depth understanding of the current market pertaining to the application being developed. Very few or no competitive alternatives exist on the market. The proposal clearly identifies all the factors that drive demand for this application and the relevant customers/stakeholders and competitors. The proposal provides a comprehensive and convincing plan for competing with any alternatives. (Score: 10 points)
2. Project scope, feasibility, resources, and risk assessment
This section is worth 30% of the total score and the minimum passing score is 15 points.
2.1 R&D methods and approach
This criterion assesses how the research will be conducted. For this criterion, the proposal should provide a complete description of the methodology and approach which will be used to conduct the research activities.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- Have the following items been provided?
- A summary of the overall approach to the research activities, including identification of the study site and the data to be used with an emphasis on the space earth observation imagery, as well as any other complementary data such as drone or in-situ data and how the data will help to demonstrate the proposed concept.
- A flow chart of the overall steps or Work Packages (WP).
- A detailed Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) with individual Work Packages describing the tasks, timelines, inputs, and outputs (deliverables).
- A Gantt chart showing the schedule with milestones by tasks.
- A description of the deliverables from the project.
- Are the research approach and methods to be used clearly described?
- Poor
The proposal provides an incomplete methodology and approach in relation to the above items (approach, study site, data, WP, WBS, Gantt chart, description of deliverables) by only addressing one or two in detail, or by providing cursory or superficial explanations that are lacking in depth. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Average
The proposal provides a basic methodology and approach in relation to the above items (approach, study site, data, WP, WBS, Gantt chart, description of deliverables) by addressing three or four in detail, or with incomplete descriptions for some of the important aspects of the methodology and approach. (Score: 5 points)
- Good
The proposal provides a good methodology and approach that suitably matches the requirements for most of the above items (approach, study site, data, WP, WBS, Gantt chart, description of deliverables) with appropriate explanations, or for all the topics, but not in detail. (Score: 7.5 points)
- Excellent
The proposal provides a thorough methodology and approach in relation to the above items (approach, study site, data, WP, WBS, Gantt chart, description of deliverables) by addressing all the topics and with detailed explanations. (Score: 10 points)
2.2 Feasibility
This criterion assesses the overall feasibility of the proposed concept. It evaluates how appropriate, realistic, and effective the proposed methodology and approach are for achieving the goals of the proposed work.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- Does the proposal include clear and convincing support for the feasibility of the methodology and approach to successfully achieve the goals and objectives of the proposed concept?
- Does the proposed implementation plan seem credible and well suited to the project objectives, and does it embody sound management?
- Poor
The proposal, as presented, does not provide convincing support for the feasibility of the concept and is likely to only achieve few of the proposal's goals. The proposed work is either unrealistic or does not include sufficient detail to judge accurately. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Average
The proposal provides some convincing support for the feasibility of the concept and is likely to achieve some of the proposal's goals. The proposed work plan is mostly complete and realistic. However, it is unclear if all proposed work will be completed during the project duration. (Score: 5 points)
- Good
The proposal provides convincing support of the feasibility of the concept and is likely to achieve most of the proposal's goals with most of the proposed work to be complete and reasonable, as planned. However, some of the proposed work may not be completed during the project duration. (Score: 7.5 points)
- Excellent
The proposed work plan is quite feasible and is very likely to achieve all the proposal's goals with the proposed work to be completed as planned. All goals listed in the proposal will likely be completed during the project duration. (Score: 10 points)
2.3 Resources
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate the expertise of the project team, including collaborators, in fields relevant to the proposed work. The proposal should include a description for each of the proposed team members stating their role(s) and responsibility(ies) within the project. Resumes should be provided in an appendix.
- Is the project lead identified?
- Is a responsibility assignment matrix (RAM) included that shows the level of effort (in days) for each team member?
- Are the responsibilities of each member well described and clear?
- Does the combined team have the necessary technical and managerial qualifications to execute the project?
- Does the proposal demonstrate how its organization contributes to EDI and/or involve Indigenous People and do they have a meaningful role?
This criterion also evaluates if the budget provided with the proposal is complete and feasible.
- Is the budget well justified by task and budget category?
- Is a detailed budget breakdown provided and is the budget appropriate?
- When available, are other sources of funding well described and used efficiently in complementarity to the CSA funding?
- Poor
The team has little experience in the relevant fields of study and the proposal includes a budget, but important information is missing or is inappropriate. (Score: 1.25 points)
- Average
The team has experience in related fields of study. However, it is missing several skillsets key to completion of the proposed work. The proposed budget appears reasonable but does not include sufficient detail to judge accurately or some items appear under- or over-estimated. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Good
The team has experience in the relevant fields of study and is well suited for the proposed work. The proposed budget is mostly complete and reasonable. The amount requested is reasonable for completion of the proposed work. (Score: 3.75 points)
- Excellent
The team has significant experience in all fields relevant to the proposed project and contains world-class expertise in certain domains. The applicant has demonstrated how its organization or team contributes to EDI (equity, diversity, and inclusion) and Indigenous People involvement – and have given them a meaningful role. The budget in the proposal provides sufficient detail to describe accurately the use of the requested funds. The amount requested is reasonable for completion of the proposed work and gives high confidence in the budget feasibility. (Score: 5 points)
2.4 Risk assessment
The purpose of this criterion is to evaluate how well the proposal identifies the potential technical and management risks associated with the proposed scope of work, an assessment of the potential likelihood of the risk occurrence, its level of impact on the work, as well as mitigation strategies for each risk. Possible risks could include difficulty hiring appropriate HQP, loss of HQP to the project, difficulty acquiring needed parts, change in data availability, etc.
- Poor
The proposal provides an incomplete risk assessment for the proposed research with important technical and management risks missing. It also lacks details to understand how identified risks could jeopardize the successful completion of the project. (Score: 1.25 points)
- Average
The proposal provides a risk assessment for the proposed research along with the mitigation strategy, but some elements from either technical or management risks are missing or show correctable weaknesses. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Good
The proposal lists credible risks to the completion of the proposed work, including effective mitigation strategies for those risks identified. However, the proposal has omitted at least one significant technical or management risk to the proposed work that is apparent to the reviewer. (Score: 3.75 points)
- Excellent
The proposal lists effective mitigation strategies for all technical and management risks to the completion of the proposed work. The proposal has not omitted any significant risks to the proposed work that are apparent to the reviewer. (Score: 5 points)
3. Outcomes and benefits to Canada
This section is worth 35% of the total score and the minimum passing score is 17.5 points.
3.1 Benefits to Canada
This criterion evaluates how well the proposal aligns with the CSA priorities selected by the applicant. These are described in Section 3.3. It also evaluates if the proposed work is innovative, impactful, and beneficial to the applicant and Canada.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- Does the project clearly respond to one of the priorities outlined in Section 3.3?
- Is the project original and of high intrinsic merit?
- How significant an advance would be made?
- Is the proposed project likely to result in long-term innovations and benefits?
- Poor
The proposal makes no mention of and does not align with any of the chosen CSA priorities. The proposed work is not original and/or has very little conceivable impact or benefit on the applicant, Canada, or the relevant field of study. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Average
The team has experience in related fields of study. However, it is missing several skillsets key to completion of the proposed work. The proposed budget appears reasonable but does not include sufficient detail to judge accurately or some items appear under- or over-estimated. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Good
The proposal specifically references elements of the chosen CSA priorities and aligns with at least one of those priorities. The proposed work is original. It will meaningfully contribute to the applicant, Canada, and the relevant field of study. (Score: 7.5 points)
- Excellent
The proposal is central to the chosen CSA priorities. It references and aligns well with multiple priorities therein. The proposed work will address key questions and significantly advance the relevant field of study and be of benefit to the applicant and Canada. (Score: 10 points)
3.2 Competitive advantage and economic benefits
This criterion assesses the merit and potential of the proposed project to positively affect the applicant's competitive advantage and/or its overall market share. It is recognized that an improvement in the applicant's overall market share (or competitive advantage) can be achieved through creating a new market, penetrating for the first time an existing one and/or increasing one's position in an already accessed market:
- How will the project impact the applicant's competitive advantage?
- What impact will the project have on the applicant's growth in terms of size (workforce) and revenues?
- Will the project impact positively other Canadian stakeholders?
- Poor
The proposed project is unlikely to impact the applicant's competitive advantage and the impact on the potential revenues generated are marginal in respect to the level of effort required to develop the application. (Score: 3.75 points)
- Average
The proposed project is likely to improve the applicant's competitive advantage and is likely to have a positive impact on applicant's growth in terms of revenue and size. (Score: 7.5 points)
- Good
The proposed project will improve the applicant's competitive advantage and will have a credible impact on the applicant's growth in terms of revenue and size. (Score: 11.25 points)
- Excellent
The proposed project will substantially improve the applicant's competitive advantage and overall growth in terms of revenue and size. The project will have a positive impact on other Canadian stakeholders. (Score: 15 points)
3.3 Expected outcomes and results
This criterion evaluates the likelihood that the proposed work will advance the targeted ARL and selected GBF target(s). It also evaluates to what degree students and/or early-career professionals will contribute to the proposed research. Proposals should include a development plan that describes how the HQP will be mentored to acquire the desired competencies.
This criterion seeks answers to the following:
- Does the defined outcome address the proposed project scope?
- Does the proposed project address 1 or more GBF targets?
- Does the proposed project clearly demonstrate the expected ARL advancement?
- Does the proposed project involve early-career professionals and/or students and are their role/activities identified?
- Poor
The proposed project is unlikely to advance the targeted ARL and selected GBF target(s). Students and/or early-career professionals will play a minor part in the proposed work. (Score: 2.5 points)
- Average
The proposed project is likely to advance the targeted ARL and selected GBF target(s). Students and/or early-career professionals will play an average role in the proposed work. (Score: 5 points)
- Good
The proposed project will advance the targeted ARL and selected GBF target(s). Students and/or early-career professionals will play a significant role in the proposed work. (Score: 7.5 points)
- Excellent
The proposed project will significantly advance the targeted ARL and selected GBF target(s). Students and/or early-career professionals will play a central role in the proposed work. (Score: 10 points)
10 APPENDIX B: Application Readiness Level (ARL) Descriptions
In this sectionAppendix B
- 10.1 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 1
- 10.2 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 2
- 10.3 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 3
- 10.4 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 4
- 10.5 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 5
- 10.6 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 6
- 10.7 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 7
- 10.8 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 8
- 10.9 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 9
The smartEarth initiative is aimed at supporting the development of innovative applications concepts through their R&D phases, which include ARLs 1 to 7. These early to mid-stage phases represent the most challenging steps in creating new applications solutions and are therefore deserving of unique support and assistance. Although ARLs 8 and 9 are recognized as being very important for the ultimate success of a product or service, they go beyond the focus of the smartEarth initiative. There are many other sources of support for the downstream sector to pursue outside of the smartEarth initiative for these last two ARLs.
10.1 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 1
10.1.1 Identification of the Application – Foundational Concepts
This initial level is at the origin of identification for any innovative idea, leading to creative approaches that will potentially resolve challenges for an application in everyday life using space-based data in a Canadian context that may also have beneficial implications for the international community. At this stage a clear understanding of the application and the challenges it faces are summarized.
10.1.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Identifying the application with challenges in need of an improvement or solution.
- Recognizing the fundamental nature of the application, including the underlying theory and dynamics in relation to space-based data.
10.1.3 Key Components
- Provide a comprehensive summary of the application and the challenges it faces, including applicable theory and dynamics, and its relevance to space data.
- Summarize the current importance and impact of the application to society.
10.2 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 2
10.2.1 Consideration of Innovative Concepts - State-of-the-Art
ARL-2 Maturity Level is the stage where innovative concepts are reviewed within the state-of-the-art for the application, and options for a potential solution are considered.
10.2.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Clear understanding of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) in relation to the chosen application.
- Review of the possible approach options that could result in a potential improvement to or eventual solution for the application. This may include new methods, systems, products, or services.
10.2.3 Key Components
- Provide a comprehensive summary of the current state-of-the-art (SOTA) in relation to the chosen application with a relevant literature review.
- Identify the shortcomings in the current SOTA and the gaps that need to be filled.
- Summarize the approach options for a potential improvement to or eventual solution for the application.
10.3 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 3
10.3.1 Selection of Preferred Approach – Logic Based
Formulation of the concept and proposed approach for the chosen application that is based on sound principles and justifications, including a summary of all the necessary concept elements and resources related to the development of the approach. The preferred approach should also summarize the innovation that has been introduced by the concept.
10.3.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Clear rationale for the selection of the proposed approach including the development plan.
- Explanation as to how the proposed approach is an improvement over current approaches for the application.
10.3.3 Key Components
- Provide a logic-based justification for the selection of the proposed approach, including the basic underlying assumptions.
- Summarize the methodology to be used, including all the necessary program elements.
- Identify the specific improvements and innovations that the approach will create.
10.4 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 4
10.4.1 Concept Development - Proof of Concept
The concept at this stage will be in a preliminary state whereby the key aspects of its main operating characteristics will have been determined and proven initially reliable for the selected application, but which has not yet been tested or validated in an operational context under a variety of conditions.
10.4.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- Individual components or aspects of the approach have been developed.
- Plan for the integration and validation of the approach components has been made.
- Risks with mitigation and corrective strategies have been considered.
10.4.3 Key Components
- The main aspects of the approach have been developed and preliminary tests successfully completed.
- Refinements to the approach have been justified and made.
- Individual components have been integrated into the overall system to confirm their viability.
10.5 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 5
10.5.1 Validation in the Application Context - Concept Feasibility
The basic components of the products, methods or service are integrated together into a prototype concept that will be validated against a real-world application to identify and correct any outstanding shortcomings or modifications that may have to be made to ensure feasibility of the concept prior to moving to the next level.
10.5.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The integrated components are to be validated and verified against empirical data related to the application.
- Based on the validation process and its results, changes to the approach may be made.
10.5.3 Key Components
- The feasibility of the concept must be demonstrated using empirical or simulated data for the application.
- Any changes to the approach should be created and demonstrated.
- The level of success should be quantifiable and realistically evaluated for the application, identifying its impact on the application.
10.6 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 6
10.6.1 Demonstration in the Application Environment - Confirmation
The concept is to be integrated and demonstrated in a relevant end user's environment and the operational decision-making context to confirm its utility in addressing the application, and for the purpose of identifying implementation adjustments to the concept and its components. Further refinements may be required. This is the critical stage where the concept starts to become a proven solution for a particular application.
10.6.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- A true test of the concept in an operational context will be successfully completed and demonstrated.
- Additional improvements may be identified to address implementation issues.
10.6.3 Key Components
- The test in an operational context has been successfully conducted, including any adjustments to the approach that had been previously identified.
- The major advantages and limitations of the concept have been identified and summarized.
- Implications to the use of the concept within the operational context have been summarized.
10.7 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 7
10.7.1 Refined Application Solution - Tailored Solution
Based on the results of the previous steps, the implementation of the solution into an operational context will require further refinements and adjustments to meet the needs of the end user. In Canada this may involve unique requirements related to language, indigenous people, northern and remote environments, extreme weather conditions over a wide range of application challenges.
10.7.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The solution may have to be tailored to meet specific applications challenges.
- Although the solution may not be able to address the needs of all users in all circumstances, it should meet the needs of specific users with identifiable requirements to facilitate implementation.
10.7.3 Key Components
- Refinements to the solution should meet the needs of specific users and be tailored and demonstrated to address those requirements.
- Acceptance of the performance of the solution should be confirmed by the user along with their recommendations related to the operational steps.
10.8 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 8
10.8.1 Practical Implementation - Operational Use
The application product, method or service will be integrated into an end user's operational context to address a particular application challenge. Its utility will have been demonstrated and confirmed, and its role in the operational context will have tangible benefits to the end user and their partners.
10.8.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The solution will have met or exceeded operational expectations and begin to build a proven record of achievement.
- The solution will begin to grow to a wider level of use or have a greater degree of impact within the user's operations.
10.8.3 Key Components
- The operational details for implementation will have been identified and accommodated within the user's organization, including training and procedures.
- Tangible benefits will be identified and summarized, along with any further recommendations for future improvements or uses.
10.9 smartEarth Application Readiness Level 9
10.9.1 Ready-to-Use Products and Services – Commercialization
The solution will have achieved a successful level of use within a user's operational environment and addressed the resolution of an application challenge. It will have reached a level of maturity to the point of its regular and consistent use within an operational context whereby the product, method or service would be ready for commercialization or for integration into other important user environments.
10.9.2 Milestones to Accomplish
- The solution has achieved widespread recognition and use within several operational environments.
- Ultimately, the solution has the potential to become the gold standard in addressing a pressing application challenge.
10.9.3 Key Components
- The solution is in regular, operational use within a variety of organizations and is recognized as an appropriate solution for a particular application.
- The solution has been commercialized and is enjoying rewarding sales and widespread use in the marketplace.
- The solution has potential to be extended to other applications fields and to new user communities.
11 APPENDIX C Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) Target Definitions
In this sectionAppendix C
- Target 1: Spatial planning and effective management
- Target 2: Ecosystem restoration
- Target 3: Protected and conserved areas (30x30)
- Target 4: Species recovery
- Target 5: Exploitation of species / wild species harvesting, use and trade
- Target 6: Invasive alien species
- Target 7: Pollution and biodiversity
- Target 8: Climate change and biodiversity
- Target 9: Sustainable use and management of wild species
- Target 10: Sustainable management in key productive sectors
- Target 11: Ecosystem services and functions
- Target 12: Urban green and blue spaces
- Target 13/15c: Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing
- Target 14: Mainstreaming of biodiversity values
- Target 15a: Business' role
- Target 16/15b: Sustainable consumption
- Target 17: Biosafety/biotechnology
- Target 18: Negative and positive incentives
- Target 19: Resource mobilization – Financial resources
- Target 20: Capacity building – Other resources for implementation
- Target 21: Knowledge sharing
- Target 22: Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples, women/girls, youth/children, persons with disabilities, and environmental human rights defenders in decision making
- Target 23: Gender equality
The smartEarth initiative is aimed at supporting the development of innovative applications concepts through their R&D phases, which include KMGBF targets.
Below are the high-level definitions of each target. These are further described within the Nature strategy where one will find more information on the "current status", "challenges and opportunities," "what we're doing," and "going further."
Target 1: Spatial planning and effective management
Ensure that all areas are under participatory integrated biodiversity inclusive spatial planning and/or effective management processes addressing land and sea use change, to bring the loss of areas of high biodiversity importance, including ecosystems of high ecological integrity, close to zero by , while respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities.
Target 2: Ecosystem restoration
Ensure that by at least 30% of areas of degraded terrestrial, inland water, and marine and coastal ecosystems are under effective restoration, to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, ecological integrity, and connectivity.
Target 3: Protected and conserved areas (30x30)
Ensure and enable that by at least 30 percent of terrestrial and inland water, and of coastal and marine areas, especially areas of particular importance for biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, are effectively conserved and managed through ecologically representative, well-connected and equitably governed systems of protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures, recognizing indigenous and traditional territories, where applicable, and integrated into wider landscapes, seascapes and the ocean, while ensuring that any sustainable use, where appropriate in such areas, is fully consistent with conservation outcomes, recognizing and respecting the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities, including over their traditional territories.
Target 4: Species recovery
Ensure urgent management actions to halt human induced extinction of known threatened species and for the recovery and conservation of species, in particular threatened species, to significantly reduce extinction risk, as well as to maintain and restore the genetic diversity within and between populations of native, wild and domesticated species to maintain their adaptive potential, including through in situ and ex situ conservation and sustainable management practices, and effectively manage human-wildlife interactions to minimize human-wildlife conflict for coexistence.
Target 5: Exploitation of species / wild species harvesting, use and trade
Ensure that the use, harvesting and trade of wild species is sustainable, safe and legal, preventing overexploitation, minimizing impacts on non-target species and ecosystems, and reducing the risk of pathogen spillover, applying the ecosystem approach, while respecting and protecting customary sustainable use by indigenous peoples and local communities.
Target 6: Invasive alien species
Eliminate, minimize, reduce and or mitigate the impacts of invasive alien species on biodiversity and ecosystem services by identifying and managing pathways of the introduction of alien species, preventing the introduction and establishment of priority invasive alien species, reducing the rates of introduction and establishment of other known or potential invasive alien species by at least 50 per cent by , and eradicating or controlling invasive alien species, especially in priority sites, such as islands.
Target 7: Pollution and biodiversity
Reduce pollution risks and the negative impact of pollution from all sources, by , to levels that are not harmful to biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services, considering cumulative effects, including: reducing excess nutrients lost to the environment by at least half including through more efficient nutrient cycling and use; reducing the overall risk from pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by at least half including through integrated pest management, based on science, taking into account food security and livelihoods; and also preventing, reducing, and working towards eliminating plastic pollution.
Target 8: Climate change and biodiversity
Minimize the impact of climate change and ocean acidification on biodiversity and increase its resilience through mitigation, adaptation, and disaster risk reduction actions, including through nature-based solutions and/or ecosystem-based approaches, while minimizing negative and fostering positive impacts of climate action on biodiversity.
Target 9: Sustainable use and management of wild species
Ensure that the management and use of wild species are sustainable, thereby providing social, economic, and environmental benefits for people, especially those in vulnerable situations and those most dependent on biodiversity, including through sustainable biodiversity-based activities, products and services that enhance biodiversity, and protecting and encouraging customary sustainable use by indigenous peoples and local communities.
Target 10: Sustainable management in key productive sectors
Ensure that areas under agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries and forestry are managed sustainably, in particular through the sustainable use of biodiversity, including through a substantial increase of the application of biodiversity friendly practices, such as sustainable intensification, agroecological and other innovative approaches, contributing to the resilience and long-term efficiency and productivity of these production systems, and to food security, conserving and restoring biodiversity and maintaining nature's contributions to people, including ecosystem functions and services.
Target 11: Ecosystem services and functions
Restore, maintain, and enhance nature's contributions to people, including ecosystem functions and services, such as regulation of air, water, and climate, soil health, pollination, and reduction of disease risk, as well as protection from natural hazards and disasters, through nature-based solutions and/or ecosystem-based approaches for the benefit of all people and nature.
Target 12: Urban green and blue spaces
Significantly increase the area and quality, and connectivity of, access to, and benefits from green and blue spaces in urban and densely populated areas sustainably, by mainstreaming the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and ensure biodiversity-inclusive urban planning, enhancing native biodiversity, ecological connectivity and integrity, and improving human health and well-being and connection to nature, and contributing to inclusive and sustainable urbanization and to the provision of ecosystem functions and services.
Target 13/15c: Access to genetic resources and benefit-sharing
Target 13: Take effective legal, policy, administrative, and capacity-building measures at all levels, as appropriate, to ensure the fair and equitable sharing of benefits that arise from the utilization of genetic resources and from digital sequence information on genetic resources, as well as traditional knowledge associated with genetic resources, and facilitating appropriate access to genetic resources, and by facilitating a significant increase of the benefits shared, in accordance with applicable international access and benefit-sharing instruments.
Target 15c: Take legal, administrative or policy measures to encourage and enable business, and in particular to ensure that large and transnational companies and financial institutions: (c) Report on compliance with access and benefit-sharing regulations and measures, as applicable.
Target 14: Mainstreaming of biodiversity values
Ensure the full integration of biodiversity and its multiple values into policies, regulations, planning and development processes, poverty eradication strategies, strategic environmental assessments, environmental impact assessments and, as appropriate, national accounting, within and across all levels of government and across all sectors, in particular those with significant impacts on biodiversity, progressively aligning all relevant public and private activities, and fiscal and financial flows with the goals and targets of this framework.
Target 15a: Business' role
Take legal, administrative or policy measures to encourage and enable business, and to ensure that large and transnational companies and financial institutions:
- Regularly monitor, assess, and transparently disclose their risks, dependencies and impacts on biodiversity, including with requirements for all large as well as transnational companies and financial institutions along their operations, supply and value chains and portfolios.
- Provide information needed to consumers to promote sustainable consumption patterns.
- Report on compliance with access and benefit-sharing regulations and measures, as applicable.
To progressively reduce negative impacts on biodiversity, increase positive impacts, reduce biodiversity-related risks to business and financial institutions, and promote actions to ensure sustainable patterns of production.
Note: for 15(b) refer to Target 16, and for 15(c) refer to Target 13.
Target 16/ 15b: Sustainable consumption
Target 16: Ensure that people are encouraged and enabled to make sustainable consumption choices including by establishing supportive policy, legislative or regulatory frameworks, improving education and access to relevant and accurate information and alternatives, and by reduce the global footprint of consumption in an equitable manner, including through halving global food waste, significantly reducing overconsumption and substantially reducing waste generation, in order for all people to live well in harmony with Mother Earth.
Target 15b: Take legal, administrative or policy measures to encourage and enable business, and to ensure that large and transnational companies and financial institutions: (b) Provide information needed to consumers to promote sustainable consumption patterns.
Target 17: Biosafety/biotechnology
Establish, strengthen capacity for, and implement in all countries, biosafety measures as set out in Article 8(g) of the Convention on Biological Diversity and measures for the handling of biotechnology and distribution of its benefits as set out in Article 19 of the Convention.
Target 18:Negative and positive incentives
Identify by , and eliminate, phase out or reform incentives, including subsidies, harmful for biodiversity, in a proportionate, just, fair, effective, and equitable way, while substantially and progressively reducing them by at least $500 billion per year by , starting with the most harmful incentives, and scale up positive incentives for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity.
Target 19: Resource mobilization – Financial resources
Substantially and progressively increase the level of financial resources from all sources, in an effective, timely and easily accessible manner, including domestic, international, public, and private resources, in accordance with Article 20 of the Convention, to implement national biodiversity strategies and action plans, by mobilizing at least 200 billion United States dollars per year, including by:
- Increasing total biodiversity related international financial resources from developed countries, including official development assistance, and from countries that voluntarily assume obligations of developed country Parties, to developing countries, in particular the least developed countries and small island developing States, as well as countries with economies in transition, to at least US$ 20 billion per year by , and to at least US$ 30 billion per year by .
- Significantly increasing domestic resource mobilization, facilitated by the preparation and implementation of national biodiversity finance plans or similar instruments according to national needs, priorities, and circumstances.
- Leveraging private finance, promoting blended finance, implementing strategies for raising new and additional resources, and encouraging the private sector to invest in biodiversity, including through impact funds and other instruments.
- Stimulating innovative schemes such as payment for ecosystem services, green bonds, biodiversity offsets and credits, benefit-sharing mechanisms, with environmental and social safeguards.
- Optimizing co-benefits and synergies of finance targeting the biodiversity and climate crises.
- Enhancing the role of collective actions, including by indigenous peoples and local communities, Mother Earth centric actions and non-market-based approaches including community based natural resource management and civil society cooperation and solidarity aimed at the conservation of biodiversity.
- Enhancing the effectiveness, efficiency and transparency of resource provision and use.
Target 20: Capacity building – Other resources for implementation
Strengthen capacity-building and development, access to and transfer of technology, and promote development of and access to innovation and technical and scientific cooperation, including through South South, North-South and triangular cooperation, to meet the needs for effective implementation, particularly in developing countries, fostering joint technology development and joint scientific research programs for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and strengthening scientific research and monitoring capacities, commensurate with the ambition of the goals and targets of the Framework.
Target 21: Knowledge sharing
Ensure that the best available data, information and knowledge, are accessible to decision makers, practitioners and the public to guide effective and equitable governance, integrated and participatory management of biodiversity, and to strengthen communication, awareness-raising, education, monitoring, research and knowledge management and, also in this context, traditional knowledge, innovations, practices and technologies of indigenous peoples and local communities should only be accessed with their free, prior and informed consent, in accordance with national legislation.
Target 22: Inclusion of Indigenous Peoples, women/girls, youth/children, persons with disabilities, and environmental human rights defenders in decision making
Ensure the full, equitable, inclusive, effective and gender-responsive representation and participation in decision-making, and access to justice and information related to biodiversity by indigenous peoples and local communities, respecting their cultures and their rights over lands, territories, resources, and traditional knowledge, as well as by women and girls, children and youth, and persons with disabilities and ensure the full protection of environmental human rights defenders.
Target 23: Gender equality
Ensure gender equality in the implementation of the framework through a gender-responsive approach where all women and girls have equal opportunity and capacity to contribute to the three objectives of the Convention, including by recognizing their equal rights and access to land and natural resources and their full, equitable, meaningful, and informed participation and leadership at all levels of action, engagement, policy and decision-making related to biodiversity.