Language selection

Search


Top of page

Flights and Fieldwork for the Advancement of Science and Technology (FAST )

On this page

Announcement of opportunity

Publication date:

Application deadline:

Summary of Key Information

Important notice: due to technical issues encountered with the Electronic Proposal Portal, we have decided to extend the application deadline until Wednesday, at 5:00 p.m. (ET). We believe this extension will enable applicants to submit their proposals on time.

  • Expected budget for this Announcement of Opportunity (AO): $5.6 million
  • Eligible recipients: Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions
  • Type of transfer payments: Grants
  • Maximum amount per grant (2 funding categories):
    • Category A: $500,000
    • Category B: $300,000
  • Maximum duration of a project per grant: up to three years
  • Estimated project start date: onwards
  • New Application deadline:

Important notice

FAST has undergone several changes since the FAST AO. These changes have been applied throughout the FAST AO and application form. Applicants are asked to read the AO thoroughly before submitting their applications, including the Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) section, which is updated on a regular basis after the AO has been posted.

1. Introduction

The objective of the Flights and Fieldwork for the Advancement of Science and Technology (FAST) AO is to support the research projects in Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions that will contribute to the development of new scientific knowledge and space technologies, while giving students hands-on experience in space-like missions.

Building Canadian capacity in space science and technology is a priority for the Canadian Space Agency (CSA). In addition to the development of space science technologies and knowledge, Canada must develop and maintain a robust and experienced workforce within industry, academia, and government in order to continue playing an active role in future space missions and creating socio-economic benefits for Canadians.

"Space-like missions" are projects that enable space experts in academia to propose research to maintain their expertise, in addition to attracting and training the next generation of space professionals, and prepare for future missions. These projects generally consist of the following:

"Space-like missions" attempt to faithfully reproduce the requirements, operations, or constraints of real space missions. By replicating the conditions of real missions, space-like missions, provide valuable, low-cost training experience for students and postdoctoral fellows (PDFs), thereby contributing more directly to Canada's priorities regarding research.

A "simulated space environment" includes:

A simulated space environment is an ideal environment to conduct space-like missions, and to provide students and PDFs with learning opportunities and obtain practical experience in projects related to all aspects of space missions. Since these projects are consistent with the length of time required to complete a master's and doctorate program, they present students with an excellent opportunity to acquire hands-on experience prior to entering the Canada's space workforce.

This AO is consistent with the terms and conditions of the CSA Class Grant and Contribution (G&C) Program to Support Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology – Research Component.

Applicants are asked to read the following AO thoroughly before submitting their applications. This AO was prepared to help applicants complete the application process, and outlines key elements, including eligibility criteria, details on eligible projects and the selection process. In the event of any discrepancies between this AO and the individual funding agreements governing a project, the latter document(s) will take precedence.

2. AO objectives

In accordance with the Space Strategy for Canada, the main objectives of the FAST AO  are to:

3. Eligibility criteria

In this section

3.1 Eligible recipients

  • Canadian universities and post-secondary institutions.

3.2 Eligible projects

To be eligible, all research projects must include the following elements:

  • Activities related to at one (1) of the research disciplines and one (1) of its associated research priorities identified for this FAST AO (see Section 3.3);
  • A funding request that falls under one of the two identified funding categories below (see Section 6.1 for further details):
    • Category A: up to $500,000 for a project of up to three years;
    • Category B: up to $300,000 for a project of up to three years;
  • The participation of:
    • At least five (5) Canadian students in a project funded under Funding Category A;
    • At least three (3) Canadian students in a project funded under Funding Category B;
  • A training plan.

In addition, a research project proposed under Funding Category A must consist of an end-to-end space-like mission project that includes:

  • The development or improvement of a technology; and,
  • A science investigation or use of a technology during a flight or field deployment; and
  • Data collection and analysis.

Please note:

  • Projects whose primary objectives are to analyze data of an existing space mission (satellite currently in orbit) or to develop applications using data from an existing space mission are not eligible for this AO. Note that the project objectives must be identified in Section 7 of the application form.
  • Projects that propose using the ISS as their research platform are not eligible for this AO unless they propose to proceed through a commercial route that will not require the use of Canada's ISS utilization rights (such as those using Nanoracks' external platforms or Space Tango platforms);
  • A project may not be eligible for funding if the applicant was previously awarded funding by the CSA for a similar project that is underway. If the proposed project is directly or indirectly related to a project that was previously funded through a CSA AO or Request for Proposal (RFP), the applicant may still be eligible for funding if the proposed project activities are complementary in nature and do not overlap with those of the previously funded project that is ongoing (see Section 4 of the application form).

Note that only one eligible applicant (institution) may submit an application, who would be the only signatory of a grant agreement (a proposal submitted by two or more co-applicants will not be accepted). Different universities and post-secondary institutions may submit separate applications for different elements of the same project. In such cases, each application must include separate research or scientific activities requiring the participation of different Canadian students and PDFs, and the applicant must demonstrate that their project can achieve success regardless of the acceptance or refusal of the other post-secondary institution's application.

All development phases necessary for a project are eligible. Any logical breakdown or combination of these phases can constitute a funded project under this AO. However, breaking down a project into numerous phases submitted as distinct proposals to obtain more than the maximum grant or contribution under this AO is not allowed. Furthermore, the completion of a funded phase does not automatically guarantee future funding of the remaining phases.

3.3 Links to CSA priorities

To be eligible, projects supported for the purposes of this AO must focus on one (1) of the research disciplines and one (1) of its associated research priorities indicated in the following table:

Table 1: Eligible research disciplines and priorities
Research disciplines Funding categories
(see Section 6.1)
Research priorities
Innovative Space Technology All

Projects related to the development (including prototyping, testing and/or demonstration) of innovative technologies for satellites. Projects that build on existing technologies are acceptable provided they include new methodologies or significant improvement to existing technologies. Example technologies include:

  • Sensors and actuators for the determination and control of spacecraft attitude and orbit;
  • Antennas, transmitters and receivers for satellite communications;
  • On-board power generation, transmission and storage;
  • Rocket propulsion and rocket related components;
  • On-board computing and artificial intelligence system;
  • Deployment mechanisms and actuators for arrays and appendages;

Other technologies linked to a space instrument or platform that are not listed here and that do not respond to one of the other research priorities below may also be eligible.

Space Health and Life Science All Projects that use simulated/analogue space environments and/or extended reality (XR) to better understand health on Earth or to develop better ways to monitor or maintain health on Earth, or to prevent or to treat diseases relevant to the Canadian population, or to advance health systems research. Although the primary objectives of the proposed project should focus on health on Earth, the applicant shall also explain how the knowledge acquired through the proposed project could also be applied to address health risks associated with human spaceflight. Projects that employ test-beds to advance food production technologies and sciences at the intersection of food production in space and on Earth will also be considered. Applicants can also apply for funding if the PI is a Co-I of an international space-related research project that has been funded by another space agency, as long as the principal research objective of the project submitted under the FAST AO is to use space to improve health or food production on Earth.
Space Astronomy All

Projects that address space astronomy objectives identified in the Canadian Astronomical Society (CASCA) Long Range Plan and the Mid-Term Review (LRP2020_December2020-1.pdf (casca.ca) or the Canadian Space Exploration: Science and Space Health Priorities report (PDF, 3.656 MB). Projects may include the development of prototypes of astronomical instruments for which testing requires the use of balloons or nanosatellites; and/or data analysis and preliminary studies related to creation of new instruments and the defining of new missions and scientific research.

Projects related to the following CSA-supported missions are not eligible for funding under this AO:

  • James Webb Space Telescope (JWST);
  • Astrosat;
  • BRIght-star Target Explorer (BRITE);
  • Near-Earth Object Surveillance Satellite (NEOSSat);
  • X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM).
  • ARIEL.
Planetary Exploration All

Projects that address planetary exploration objectives identified in the Canadian Space Exploration: Science and Space Health Priorities report (PDF, 3.573 MB). Projects may include the development of prototypes of planetary exploration instruments for which testing requires the use of analogue sites, balloons or nanosatellites; and/or data analysis and preliminary studies related to creation of new instruments and the defining of new missions and scientific research.

Projects related to the following CSA-supported missions/programs are not eligible for funding under this AO:

  • Lunar Exploration Accelerator Program (LEAP);
  • OSIRIS-REx;
  • Mars Ice Mapper (MIM);
  • Mars Science Laboratory (MSL).
Atmospheric Sciences All

Projects related to remote sensing of the composition and dynamics of the atmosphere, of clouds and of precipitation, primarily in Canada. Eligible projects may include the following activities:

  • Measurements using existing instruments with proven capabilities, for the purpose of measuring new physical or chemical atmospheric processes; and
  • Measurements using innovative instruments that show promise for future satellite missions, for the purpose of demonstrating the capabilities of the instrument(s) and the scientific value of the observations.
Earth System Science All

Projects related to remote sensing of the Earth's surface and sub-surface including but not limited to: surface elevation, surface temperature, soil moisture , land cover, biomass, fires, cryosphere (permafrost, freeze/thaw state, snow and ice cover properties), surface water colour, storage and dynamics, and other variables of interest to Canada. Eligible projects may include the following activities:

  • Measurements using existing instruments with proven capabilities, for the purpose of measuring physical or chemical Earth surface processes; and,
  • Measurements using innovative instruments that show promise for future satellite missions, for the purpose of demonstrating the capabilities of the instrument(s) and the scientific value of the observations.
Solar-Terrestrial Science All

Projects related to in situ measurements or remote sensing of the Sun and its radiation, including but not limited to : energetic particles, magnetic fields, electric fields, and geospatial interactions with the neutral atmosphere. Eligible projects may include the development, deployment and measurements using innovative or existing instruments, to support a research project or demonstrate capability.

Note that applicants proposing projects that respond to more than one of the above-mentioned research disciplines must indicate one primary research discipline in the application form (Section 4, questions 5 and 6). All other research disciplines will be considered as secondary. The evaluations of the proposals will be completed based on the applicant's selection of primary research discipline.

4. Submitting an application

In this section

The applicant must read the following section carefully and follow all of the steps below in order to ensure their application is completed and submitted successfully.

4.1 How to submit an application electronically

  1. Download and complete the grant application form;
  2. Combine the following documents into a single PDF-formatted file, in the same order as is presented below. A complete application must contain the following:
    • A completed application form signed (with handwritten or digital signature) by the duly authorized representative;
    • A proposal that complies with the guidelines outlined in Section 8 of the application form;
    • The curriculum vitae for each member of the team (PI, Co-investigators and PDFs who are members of the project team);
    • A detailed implementation schedule for the project;
    • A letter of support from each co-investigator;
    • Declaration on Confidentiality, Access to Information Act and Privacy Act form signed by the duly authorized representative (refer to the Applicant Declaration on Confidentiality, Access to Information Act and Privacy Act section included in the application form);
    • For organizations in Quebec, M-30 Supporting Documentation form completed and signed by the duly authorized representative (refer to the M-30 form included in the application form).

    The following documents may be required upon request:

    • A copy of the document(s) confirming the legal name of the applicant;
    • Letters from other funding contributors confirming their contributions (if applicable).

    The application must be prepared as a single PDF-formatted file containing all of the above requested documents with all security features disabled. The proposal and supporting documents must be included in the file as searchable PDF-formatted documents (PDF/A-1a or PDF/A-2a formats preferred). If there are any accessibility issues with the submitted PDF file, all consequences reside with the applicant.

    It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that the application complies with all relevant federal, provincial/territorial and municipal laws and regulations.

    The applicant must keep one hard copy of all the original documents above. The CSA may require applicants who successfully passed the evaluation stage described in Section 5 of the AO to send a hard copy of their complete application with the original documents.

  3. Submit the completed application electronically:
    • Submit an account creation request using the Electronic Proposal Portal. Please note that Google Chrome is the browser of choice for submissions. Supported browsers are Google Chrome and Internet Explorer with some restrictions.
    • In the "Proposal title" field of the Electronic Proposal Portal, please use the following formatting standard: FAST 2023_Funding Category(A or B)_Name Of Institution_Last name of PI (e.g. FAST 2023_A_McGill_Smith).
    • In the "Organization" section, under "Type", please select "Canadian university or post-secondary institution".
    • The "Applicant" section should contain the contact information for the PI.
    • Allow up to 72 hours for the CSA to send an email confirming the account creation as well as instructions (user guide) on how to access the platform. It is strongly recommended that the account creation request be submitted no later than .
    • Using the temporary password assigned by the CSA, login to the secured portal to upload protected documents.
    • Please refer to the user guide for instructions on how to securely upload documents.

Please note:

  • Applicants using the electronic portal are encouraged to create their account no later than , as technical difficulties may arise. If technical issues cannot be resolved, applicants must submit their application by mail. Applicants are strongly encouraged to upload their complete application well before the submission deadline;
  • Applications must be submitted (successfully uploaded) by the applicants no later than at 5:00 p.m. (ET).
  • The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all documents are uploaded on the Electronic Proposal Portal within the prescribed deadline;
  • The CSA is not responsible for any delays under any circumstances, and will refuse applications that are received after the stipulated deadline;
  • Hand-delivered applications will not be accepted;
  • Applications sent by e-mail will not be accepted;
  • Applicants are asked to not send their application both electronically and by mail or courier service. If multiple applications are submitted, only the latest valid version received will be considered;
  • Incomplete applications will not be considered.

Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the FAQ Section of this AO (see Section 9). The CSA will not answer questions received after .

4.2 How to submit an application by mail or using a recognized courier service

The applicant is encouraged to submit their application electronically following the instructions provided in Section 4.1 of the AO. However, if the applicant is unable to submit their application electronically, please communicate with stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca no later than to obtain instructions on how to submit a paper application by mail or using a recognized courier service. 

Applications by mail or using a recognized courier service must be received at the CSA no later than at 5:00 p.m. (ET).

The onus is on the applicant to ensure that their application is complete and that all documents are received by the CSA within the prescribed deadline. The CSA is not responsible for any delays under any circumstances, and will refuse applications that are received after the stipulated deadline.

4.3 Service standards for this AO – Complete applications

Applicants will be notified in writing of decisions regarding their application. Selected applications will be proactively divulged on the Open Government website. The CSA has set the following service standards for application processing times, acknowledgements of receipt, funding decisions and payment procedures.

Acknowledgement of receipt: The CSA's goal is to acknowledge receipt of applications within two (2) weeks following the AO's closing date.

Decision: The CSA's goal is to respond to the application within fifteen (15) weeks following the AO's closing date and to send a grant agreement for signature within two (2) weeks after formal approval of the application.

Payment: The CSA's goal is to issue payment within four (4) weeks of the successful fulfillment of the requirements outlined in the grant agreement.

Compliance with these service standards is a shared responsibility. Applicants must submit all required documentation in a timely manner.

5. Evaluation

In this section

5.1 Eligibility criteria

Applications will first be submitted for an eligibility assessment to verify whether they comply with the following criteria:

  • The applicant is an eligible recipient as defined in Section 3.1;
  • The proposed project is an eligible project as defined in Sections 3.2, 3.3, and Appendix A;
  • The application complies with the funding provisions of the program stated in Section 6.1.

5.2 Evaluation criteria

Once the eligibility assessment is completed, applications will be evaluated according to the following criteria:

  • Benefits to Canada and outcomes;
  • Feasibility and risks;
  • Resources.

Table 2 below shows the criteria, sub-criteria and associated thresholds, while Table 3 shows a brief description of the graded criteria. A detailed breakdown of all of the evaluation criteria is described in Appendix C. To be considered eligible for funding, the total score obtained for these graded criteria must be 70/100 or greater.

Table 2: Summary table of evaluation criteria
Criteria Maximum points
for evaluation
Minimum points
to pass
Poor Average Good Excellent
1. Benefits to Canada and outcomes 45 33 - - - -
1.1 Proposed research 20 - 0 10 15 20
1.2 Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) 5 - 0 1 3 5
1.3 Training plan 20 - 0 10 15 20
2. Feasibility and risks 25 17 - - - -
2.1 Research plan and schedule 15 - 0 5 10 15
2.2 Project-related risks and mitigation strategies 10 - 0 4 7 10
3. Resources 30 20 - - - -
3.1 Project team 15 - 0 5 10 15
3.2 Budget, funding, physical resources and infrastructure 15 - 0 5 10 15
TOTAL 100 70 - - - -

Table 3: Definition and breakdown of selection criteria

1. Benefits to Canada and outcomes
  • Max. score: 45
  • Min. score: 33
1.1 Proposed research

Max. score: 20
This criterion is used to evaluate the originality of the research and its probable impact and potential to advance knowledge in the field of space science and/or technology, directly or indirectly. This criterion is also used to evaluate whether the research is aligned with the research priorities outlined in Section 3.3 of the AO.

1.2 Equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI)
Max. score: 5
This criterion evaluates how the project will facilitate the access and the participation of the members of designated and marginalized groups or individuals (e.g.: Indigenous people, women, members of visible minorities, persons with disabilities, 2SLGBTQ+, people from socio-economically disadvantaged communities) in the research team.
1.3 Training plan
Max. score: 20
This criterion is used to evaluate the quality, relevance and clarity of the training plan, as well as the impact of the knowledge and experience that the students will acquire.
2. Feasibility and risks
  • Max. score: 25
  • Min. score: 17
2.1 Research plan and schedule
Max. score: 15
This criterion is used to evaluate the clarity, completeness, and feasibility of the research plan, with the duties and responsibilities, contributions and level of involvement of each team member clearly identified. The criterion is also used to evaluate the likelihood that the work will be completed on schedule.
2.2 Project-related risks and mitigation strategies
Max. score: 10
This criterion is used to evaluate the applicant's analysis of the main risks associated with the project, as well as the mitigation strategies for each risk.
3. Resources
  • Max. score: 30
  • Min. score: 20
3.1 Project team
Max. score: 15
This criterion is used to evaluate the quality of the project team (PIs, co-investigators or PDFs, as applicable), its combination of expertise, its capacity to carry out the research project, the skills of team members, and the past achievements of team members.
3.2 Budget, funding, physical resources and infrastructure
Max. score: 15
This criterion is used to evaluate whether the planned budget is adequate to achieve the project's objectives. It also takes the project's various sources of funding into consideration. It is also used to evaluate the timely availability of physical resources (equipment, instruments and/or scientific data) and infrastructure (ground-based infrastructure, suborbital/orbital platform, analogue site).

5.3 Evaluation process

Only applications that have passed the eligibility assessment listed in Section 5.1 will be given further consideration.

Once the eligibility criteria are confirmed, evaluators will assess the screened applications according to the criteria listed in Section 5.2. The evaluators will be experts in the fields relevant to the applications. Evaluators may include representatives of the Government of Canada and of other countries, as well as representatives of other governmental and non-governmental agencies and organizations. If applicable, a multidisciplinary evaluation committee will be formed to evaluate interdisciplinary applications.

An application must receive an overall minimum score of 70% as well as achieve the minimum thresholds specified in Table 2 to be deemed eligible for funding.

Before a final decision is made, the CSA's program manager responsible for this AO may seek input and advice from other organizations, including municipal, provincial, territorial and federal governmental agencies and organizations.

A selection committee made up of CSA executive management members will carry out a strategic overall selection based on Government of Canada and CSA priorities, such as:

  • Alignment with the identified research priorities;
  • Balance between the seven research disciplines mentioned in the AO;
  • Regional distribution;
  • Diversity among universities and post-secondary institutions;
  • Representation of PI who belong to one or both of the following underrepresented groups: women and Indigenous Peoples;
  • Support for early career researchers acting as PI (an early career researcher is defined as an individual who has held an independent university position for a maximum of five years).

6. Funding

In this section

6.1 Available funding

Transfer payments will be made through grant agreements. The total funding available under this AO is currently expected to be approximately $5.6 million. The two funding categories are:

  • Category A: Maximum grant of $500,000 for a maximum duration of three years for an end-to-end space-like mission project that includes the development or improvement of a technology, use of the technology during a flight, a field deployment or a research site deployment, and data collection and analysis; the maximum amount available per year is $200,000;
  • Category B: Maximum grant of $300,000 for a maximum duration of three years, for a space-related research project; the maximum amount available per year is $150,000;

For both categories, CSA accepts proposals whose total budget is less than the maximum grant mentioned above.

The CSA intends to fund at least one project per research discipline defined in Section 3.3. The overall number of grants awarded and their value will depend on the availability of funds and the results of the evaluation process.

Prior to each instalment, the CSA will reassess the recipient's eligibility and review the recipient's report on performance indicators.

A recipient's grant agreement may be amended, for instance, to allow a recipient to fly or use its payload or technology a second time during an additional flight mission or fieldwork campaign. In order for this to take place, the recipient must provide an adequate justification demonstrating that the re-flight or re-use will result in an advancement of the science, technology or payload. In such a case, the grant agreement would be amended under the same terms and conditions as those set out in the original grant agreement. Under such an amendment, additional funding to support travel and living expenses and related overhead costs may be awarded to a recipient, subject to the availability of funds, the justification provided by the recipient, and at the entire discretion of the CSA.

Given the objectives of this AO and the limited available budget, an eligible recipient (institution) may submit several applications; however if two or more applications are submitted with the same designated PI, the CSA reserves the right to select only one of these projects. An eligible recipient may submit only one application for the same project. However, two or more distinct applicants (institutions) may submit separate applications for the same project if their applications concern the development of distinct technologies or scientific research. It is then expected that the students and PDFs involved in these different projects will not be the same.

Approved applications will be eligible for a total amount of government assistance (federal, provincial, territorial and municipal) of up to 100% of total project costs.

To determine the amount of funding that it will allocate, the CSA will take into account the availability of CSA funds, the total cost of the project, and other confirmed sources of funds provided by other stakeholders and the applicant. The CSA reserves the right to reject any application or reduce the amount of the grants at its entire discretion.

Applicants must identify all sources of funding in their applications and confirm this information in a funding agreement if the project is selected for funding. Upon completion of a project, the recipient must also disclose all sources of funding.

6.2 Eligible costs

Eligible costs are direct expenses that are associated with the delivery of the approved project and that are required to achieve the expected results of the project. Expenses will be covered, subject to the applicant signing a grant agreement with the CSA.

Eligible costs for a grant under this AO are the following:

  • Access fees;
  • Accommodation and meal allowances;
  • Acquisition, development and printing of materials;
  • Acquisition or rental of equipment (a maximum of 30% of the CSA grant could be used for laboratory instruments);
  • Aircraft and watercraft charter services;
  • Bursaries;
  • Consultant services (not to exceed 30% of the CSA grant);
  • Costs for carrying out environmental screening and/or impact studies;
  • Costs related to obtaining security clearance;
  • Data acquisition;
  • Data management;
  • Laboratory analysis services;
  • License and permit fees;
  • Launcher services;
  • Marketing and printing services;
  • Materials and supplies;
  • Participation fees at conferences, committees and events;
  • PST, HST and GST net of any rebate to which the recipient is entitled, and the reimbursement of any taxes for goods and services acquired in a foreign country net of any rebate or reimbursement received in the foreign country;
  • Publication and communication services;
  • Registration fees;
  • Salaries and benefits paid to eligible students;
  • Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students (not to exceed 30% of total CSA grant value);
  • Training;
  • Translation services;
  • Travel expenses;
  • Overhead (administrative) costs (not to exceed 10% of eligible costs).

Important note: The salaries of university faculty or college professors/teachers are not eligible expenses under this AO; however, the salaries of non-faculty co-investigators (e.g. technicians, program managers, etc.) are eligible expenses (falling under the "Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students" category).

6.3 Other funding sources

The CSA encourages applicants to apply for funding from other sources to support student training. For projects with an industrial partner, Mitacs may be an appropriate organization for obtaining funding to support student internships. Applicants are encouraged to consult the Mitacs website for further information regarding these programs and to apply for funding should they qualify.

7. Funding agreements

In this section

7.1 Payments

The CSA and each successful applicant (the recipient) will sign a grant funding agreement. This is a condition for any payment made by the CSA with respect to the approved project.

Payments will be made in a lump sum or instalments as described in the signed agreement. Grant funding agreements will include a clause stipulating the recipient's obligation to confirm, once a year in the case of multi-year agreements, their eligibility for the G&C Program – Research Component, and inform the CSA in writing of any changes to the conditions used in determining their eligibility for this component.

7.2 Unconfirmed research platform(s)

Prior to issuing a grant agreement, the successful applicant must confirm that access to the research platform has been secured (if applicable, but mandatory for projects funded under Category A). The issuance of a grant agreement is conditional upon the applicant having secured this access (or an equivalent alternative) as outlined in their application. If this confirmation is not received within the timeframe set by the CSA, the CSA reserves the right to reject the application at its entire discretion.

7.3 Audit

The recipient of a funding agreement shall keep proper records of all documentation related to the funded project, for the duration of the project and for six (6) years after the completion date of the project, in the event of an audit. This documentation shall be available upon request.

7.4 Conflict of interest

In the funding agreement, the recipient will certify that any current or former public office holder or public servant it employs complies with the provisions of the relevant Conflict of Interest and Post-Employment Code for Public Office Holders and the Values and Ethics Code for the Public Sector, respectively.

7.5 Intellectual property

All intellectual property developed by the recipient in the course of the project shall vest in the recipient.

7.6 Organizations in Quebec

An organization in Quebec whose operations are partially or fully funded by the province of Quebec may be subject to the Act Respecting the Ministère du Conseil exécutif, R.S.Q., Chapter 30.

Under Sections 3.11 and 3.12 of this Act, certain entities/organizations, as defined in the meaning of the Act, such as municipal bodies, school bodies or public agencies, must obtain authorization from the Secrétariat du Québec aux relations canadiennes (SQRC), as stipulated in the Act, before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada, its departments or agencies, or a federal public agency.

Consequently, any entity that is subject to the Act is responsible for obtaining such authorization before signing any funding agreement with the Government of Canada.

Quebec applicants must complete, sign and include the M-30 Supporting Documentation form with their application.

7.7 Performance measurement

The CSA will require recipients to report on certain elements in their projects, such as the following:

  • Creation of knowledge:
    • Advancement of knowledge (including technological breakthroughs, technologies led to a higher level);
    • Production of knowledge (including publications, research reports) (refer to Section 7.8 for expectations regarding open publications);
    • Presentations (including conferences, seminars, workshops);
    • Intellectual property (including patents) generated by the project.
  • Increased capacity:
    • Project research team (including students and PDFs involved). Note that the grant recipient may be asked to provide the names of the research team members, including the students and PDFs.
  • Collaboration:
    • Partnerships;
    • Contribution of partners;
    • Multidisciplinarity.

The CSA will also require recipients to be informed in advance of important press releases or news releases of interest to the media resulting from work related to this AO.

7.8 Open science

The CSA encourages the dissemination of the results of the projects it funds to the widest possible audience, and at the earliest possible opportunity. Greater access to science findings not only allows scientists to use a broader range of resources and knowledge, but also increase research collaboration and coordination, and support the creation of socio-economic benefits.

The CSA thus encourages recipients to practice open-access publishing and archiving to facilitate the widespread dissemination of the results of projects for which it provides funding. Recipients are therefore invited to publish their articles in a timely manner using one of the following methods:

  1. A freely accessible online repository (institution or discipline-based) so that publications are freely accessible;
  2. A journal offering free access to articles.

Publication costs are eligible expenses, as defined in Section 6.2. Note that these two methods are not mutually exclusive and that recipients are invited to use both.

Lastly, the CSA would like to receive complementary copies of publications generated as a result of the allocated funding (if not freely accessible) or the hyperlink (if freely accessible) and its digital object identifier (DOI). The hyperlink and the DOI will be incorporated into the directory of CSA publications generated as a result of allocated funding, and will be made available to the public.

Recipients are also encouraged to report on additional research outputs (such as databases and software) that create value that were generated as a result of their project.

8. Privacy Notice Statement

The CSA will manage and protect information provided by applicants under the Privacy Act and the Access to Information Act. By submitting personal information, the applicant consents to its collection, use and disclosure in accordance with the following Confidentiality Statement, which explains how information on applicants is handled.

This information is collected under the authority of the CSA Class G&C Program to Support Research, Awareness and Learning in Space Science and Technology – Research Component (ASC PPU 045) and Awareness and Learning Component (ASC PPU 040). This information will be used for administrative purposes and for the evaluation of applications. Personal information (such as name, contact information and biographical information) will be stored for six years, then destroyed. Under the Privacy Act, any individual, upon request, may

  1. be given access to his/her data, and
  2. have incorrect information corrected or add a note.

Applicants shall also note that information relative to the funding agreement will be publicly disclosed under Government of Canada legislation, policies and directives.

For additional information on privacy matters prior to submitting an application, please contact:

Access to Information and Privacy Office
Canadian Space Agency
Telephone: 514-378-6147
Email: aiprp-atip@asc-csa.gc.ca

9. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

It is the responsibility of applicants to obtain clarification of the requirements contained herein, if necessary, before submitting an application.

For any questions related to this AO, applicants shall use the following generic email address stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca. Questions and answers related to this AO will be posted on the CSA website in the FAQ Section of this AO. The CSA will not reply to questions received after .

At any point, applicants are welcome to share with the CSA their comments or suggestions regarding the Class Grant and Contribution program. Applicants may either use the generic email address or the generic web-based Comments and suggestions box.

Question 1: Does a Principal Investigator (PI) can submit two proposals? Does a PI for a project can be a co-investigator (CO-I) in another project?

Answer 1: Proposals may only be submitted by universities as eligible post-secondary institutions. It is the university's responsibility to designate the PIs responsible for the projects submitted. A university may submit one or more proposals with the same PI or Co-Is, if the proposals comply among other things, with the conditions described in the last paragraph of Section 3.2.

Question 2: In Section 6 of the application form, the number of students is to be identified for each year of the project. Often, a student participates for multiple years, e.g., an MSc student. Should the total number of students in the right-hand column of the table be stated as the number of distinct students across all years?

Answer 2: In Section 6 of the Application Form, the applicant should indicate the estimated number of distinct students, per year and per level of study (e.g., if five students are involved in the project from year one to year three and no additional students join in the subsequent years, the total number of students should be five).

Question 3: The community is aware of recent cuts to the CSA budget. Will these budget cuts impact the number of available grants resulting from this AO? And if so, can CSA provide an anticipated impact by stating an expected number of grants?

Answer 3: The number of grants awarded will be based on the available budget stated in the AO ($5.6M) and will depend on the number of proposals selected under each category and the level of funding requested by each selected proposal.

Question 4: My university lab has recently received a European Space Agency (ESA) contract award. We would like to apply for FAST AO with a project that proposes two novel technological thrusts that are complementary to the ESA awarded contract objectives. We would like to know if we can apply for FAST AO this year when ESA awarded a contract on a different project.

Answer 4: As project eligibility is an evaluation criterion, CSA cannot comment on the eligibility of any project at this stage. As stated in Section 3.2 of the AO, if the proposed project under FAST AO is directly or indirectly related to a project that has already been funded under other CSA funding opportunities, the applicant may still be eligible for funding if the proposed project's activities are complementary in nature and do not overlap with those of the previously funded project (see Section 4 of the application form). The applicant must provide sufficient information to demonstrate that the activities and resources, among others, do not overlap.

Question 5: Are shipping and import/export fees expenses eligible expenses for FAST AO?

Answer 5: Yes, shipping and import/export fees are eligible expenses. The category under each of these expenses must be included depends on the nature of the goods or services purchased for the project.

Question 6: To qualify for Category A funding, the FAST AO states that the project must include "The development or improvement of a technology". The application form further asks for a description of how "The technology that will be developed or advanced". Would raising the technology readiness level (TRL) to TRL 9 (flight in orbit) of an existing instrument that is currently at a lower TRL be sufficient for meeting the criteria for "improving" and "advancing" the technology, or must the device be changed materially, for example by hardware or firmware upgrades, to meet this criterion?

Answer 6: At this stage in the process, CSA cannot comment on the proposal's eligibility. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that their project is eligible. For projects submitted under Category A, the onus is on the applicant to provide sufficient information on how their project meets end-to-end mission and technology development requirements, amongst others.

Question 7: Our university is collaborating on a project with international partners. We would like to know if the FAST AO could cover the expenses associated with data collection and analysis for Canadian students involved in our partners' projects.

Answer 7: Under this AO, the expenses associated with the data acquisition and analysis, data management and laboratory analysis services are eligible costs.

Question 8: Section 7.2 of the AO states that "prior to issuing a grant agreement, the successful applicant must confirm that access to the research platform has been secured...". Is a letter of support from a partner PI or project leader to the applicant's representative (the FAST PI), confirming the flight with an approximate launch window (e.g., Q) sufficient confirmation as required by Section 7.2?

Answer 8: Yes, a letter of support from a partner, confirming flight availability and providing an approximate launch window, will satisfy this requirement. If the letter is not issued directly by the launch service provider, it should include the name of the launcher and, if it is already known, the location of the launch site.

Question 9: If the applicant or its partner has signed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) with a ride-share broker or launch service provider, is there a mechanism for the applicant to confirm to CSA that the research platform has been secured without violating NDA's details (such as launch cost or launcher details)?

Answer 9: If a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) relating to the launch has been signed by the applicant for the launch, sufficient information (launcher provider, launch window, launch site, etc.) must be provided in the application to demonstrate the probability that the flight will take place as per the project schedule.

Question 10: We intend to collaborate with a researcher from another country, as well as with another Canadian researcher from an American university. All HQPs, however, will be Canadians. Is this acceptable?

Answer 10: The CSA encourages international collaboration in space projects. Projects submitted for funding under this AO may include researchers of other nationalities as team members, or Canadian researchers working outside Canada. Please note that the participation of foreign researchers may be subject to an additional national security risk for research partnerships analysis.

Question 11: For a proposal under Category A, should all five students be involved in the project for the entire period of three years or is there a situation where the implication of the students for a shorter period may be acceptable? For example, a student registered in a master's degree, could finish their studies in two years.

Answer 11: It is not required for students to be involved during the entire duration of the project, whether for Category A or B, to be considered in the total number of students.

Question 12: The call invites applications related to many areas of research, including one that is of interest to us: Rocket propulsion and rocket-related components. We are wondering if you could please point us to someone/direction that can share detailed questions/challenges of CSA regarding rocket propulsion. This helps us tailor our proposed solutions/expertise to the CSA needs.

Answer 12: At this stage in the process, CSA cannot comment on the proposal's eligibility. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that their project is eligible as per criteria in sections 3.2 and 3.3.

This AO being a competitive process, it is not possible to organize a meeting between the proponent and the CSA to discuss the eligibility or other elements of a project.

Question 13: The AO mentions that "Projects related to CSA-supported missions/programs are not eligible for funding under this AO". Can you explain what criteria are used to decide if a Project related to a CSA-supported activity?

Answer 13: A Project is related to a CSA-supported activity (either past or current contract or G&C agreement related to activities listed in Table 1 of section 3.3) if its primary objective is to contribute to its success using its data, or by producing software, hardware, simulations, or documentation to support its development.

Question 14: If a project is submitted under the Category A, but with a lower budget (e.g., $200,000), does the mandatory criterion of involving five students still apply?

Answer 14: The projects with lower budgets are eligible in both categories. However, all other mandatory criteria, including the minimum number of students involved, are still applying with the same requirements.

Question 15: We have the intention to submit a funding request for a project that will require the calibration and validation activities linked to a NASA mission. Is this type of activity eligible under the present AO?

Answer 15: At this stage in the process, CSA cannot comment on the proposal's eligibility. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that their project is eligible as per criteria in sections 3.2 and 3.3.

Question 16: We have a project that is funded through the CSA Co-investigator initiative. Can we submit a new funding request for a project having the same research subject?

Answer 16: As it is stated in the AO, section 3.2, a project meeting all other eligible requirements may not be considered eligible if the proponent already received funding from CSA for similar project which is undergoing. The applicant may still be eligible for funding if the proposed project activities are complementary in nature and do not overlap with those of the previously funded project that is ongoing.

Question 17: In the evaluation and selection process, the AO states that the early career researchers acting as a PI are a priority for the CSA. Can you please elaborate on how this priority will impact the final selection of the projects?

Answer 17: After establishing the ranking based on the merit evaluation score, CSA may select, amongst the projects passing the minimum score, some projects that will contribute to the priorities mentioned in the section 5.3.

Question 18: The AO mention several times Canadian students. Could you please give a definition of what Canadian students means for the purposes of this AO?

Answer 18: For the purposes of this AO, Canadian students are the students registered in a Canadian post-secondary institution.

Question 19: Can a PDF (postdoctoral fellow) act as a PI for a project submitted under this AO? Does his or her salary is an eligible expense?

Answer 19: It is the proponent's (post-secondary institution) decision to designate the PI for each project submitted. The salaries of the PIs are not eligible expenses under this AO.

Question 20: What is the expected start date of the projects? Should be an exact date?

Answer 20: The projects start date is the date of the fully executed agreement between CSA and grant recipient. It is expected that all agreements be signed in .

Question 21: If a project receives the funding for the first (or any subsequent year) and it does not spend the entire amount, is it possible to carry over the unspent budget?

Answer 21: No, if the funds paid for a specific fiscal year (April 1st to March 31st) are not spent during that period, the remaining amounts will not be reallocated to subsequent years.

Question 22: Does the fund redistribution is acceptable under this AO?

Answer 22: No, the redistribution of funds is not permitted under this AO. The grant recipient must use the funds only for the direct and eligible expenses listed in the section 6.3 of the AO.

Question 23: Our project aims at developing a proposal that focuses on space-based HD video, and it would be very useful to include a short video clip or two in the proposal. Given the format, the options seem to include a link (e.g., to a video uploaded to video-sharing application as YouTube), or to upload one or more separate video files with the application. How can we include video materials in the application and ensure that reviewers watch it and take it into consideration?

Answer 23: For this AO, CSA does not accept videos (as a link or attached files) as part of the application and the evaluators will not take into consideration the content of any link to a video repository platform or application.

Question 24: The AO mentions: "Projects whose primary objectives are to analyze data of an existing space mission (satellite currently in orbit) or to develop applications using data from an existing space mission are not eligible for this AO." Does this mean that projects that include analysis of data from an existing space mission as a minor component will still be eligible?

Answer 24: The eligibility of a project will be evaluated, amongst others, on the primary objectives stated in section 7 of the Application Form. The projects may have other secondary objectives or activities.

Question 25: Are there any documents, templates or other forms provided by the CSA for the FAST AO?

Answer 25: The only mandatory form that CSA requires to be used is the Application Form (see section 4.1). All the other required documents (including the team members' CVs) can be created and included in the application using the templates chosen by the applicant.

Question 26: Does the requirement of using 12-point font in the application refer to all text in the application or just the main body? That is, can smaller or larger fonts be used for table entries, section headings, bibliographic entries, title-page text, and table or figure captions?

Answer 26: The use of 12-point font is required for the main body text in the application form and in the project description document. However, different fonts can be used for other section of the application such as the titles, section headings, images' titles and descriptions, footnotes, tables.

Question 27: Is a project manager's salary an eligible expense, under "Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students" category?

Answer 27: Yes, a project manager's salary is an eligible expense under "Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students" if the position is held by a person whose full-time salary is not already entirely covered by another organization.

Question 28: We sometimes work with NRC Research Officers. Can NRC researchers be co-investigators on the team? Can they be collaborators? If NRC researchers can be co-investigators, can they receive CSA funds?

Answer 28: Yes, the NRC Research Officers can collaborate in the projects and can be funded by the project under one of the eligible expenses.

Question 29: If our proposal includes cash or in-kind contributions from NRC (up and above CSA budget), would that benefit our application or look favourably to CSA?

Answer 29: The evaluation criterion definition regarding the cash or in-kind is described in the Appendix C (Scoring), section 3.2 of the AO. It is the applicant responsibility to provide sufficient information to meet the requirements for the maximum score in each category.

Question 30: Will there be any funding offered under this opportunity for PI course and/or salary buyout?

Answer 30: No, any cost related to PIs salary buyout or replacement is not an eligible expense under this AO.

Question 31: We have the intention to hire a PDF for the project. Should we put the PDF salary under the "Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students" category?

Answer 31: As it is stated in the Appendix 1 of the AO, the PDFs are considered Canadian students for the purpose of this AO and their salaries may be charged under either "Salaries and benefits paid to eligible students" or "Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students" expenses categories.

Question 32: The Application Form has 22 pages, but the limit of the proposition is of 20 pages. Does the 20-page limit apply only for the description of the project?

Answer 32: Yes, the 20-page limit applies only for the description of the project. The application form, the cover page, the references, the CVs, les documents confirming other source of funding or partnerships, and, if applicable, the M-30 Form for Quebec organizations will not be considered in the 20 pages limit.

Question 33: We have the intention to involve in the project a colleague from the United States. He is working on a very interesting subject linked to our research. Is it acceptable to have a co-investigator from another country supervising a Canadian student?

Answer 33: Yes, it is acceptable to have international team members acting as supervisor for Canadian students. However, the proposal should describe the benefits of such supervision and the actions planned to mitigate any possible barrier (e.g., communications, availability) that would prevent the student to acquire the expected competencies.

Question 34: Will there be any funding available for EDI initiatives? For example, if a student needed special travel accommodation, could this be part of the budget as an eligible expense?

Answer 34: There is no specific funding for EDI initiatives. However, if an eligible expense applies for the activities of the project (e.g., travel), the funding under this expense category can be used to cover special travel requirements.

Question 35: For the FAST application is any CV format required?

Answer 35: Any curriculum vitae format is acceptable. However it is the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the curricula vitae of the project team members include sufficient information to evaluate criterion 3.1 (Project Team), as outlined in Appendix C of the AO.

Question 36: For a PI who missed the Q&A session of the webinar, is there a recording available?

Answer 36: All the questions and answers asked during the webinar have been transcript and published in this section.

Question 37: The AO states that "In addition, a research project proposed under Funding Category A must consist of an end-to-end space-like mission project..." Can proposed activities include multiple end-to-end space-like mission projects that are related to a common research theme, or is this requirement stating that proposals for Category A must consist of a single end-to-end space-like mission?

Answer 37: Yes, the projects proposed can include more than one end-to-end space like mission related to a common research theme.

Question 38: How would we go about requesting access to the CNES balloons before the proposal is due, as there is a requirement to at least start the discussion of launch arrangements before the submission of the full AO package?

Answer 38: As STRATOS campaigns are flight opportunities offered by the CSA for, amongst others, for this AO, the applicants are not required to have a confirmation from the CSA related to access to the launch. The proposal should be developed based on the information presented in the AO, Appendix B- Access through CSA to the CNES stratospheric balloons and in the Stratospheric Balloon User Manual which can be provided upon request.

Question 39: Our proposal will include 3 parabolic flights on the NRC's Falcon20. Should the cost of these parabolic flights be included in our budget? The CSA FAST instructions (Appendix B, #2) state that “Expenses associated with the flight and the engineering support required from the CSA and the NRC for payload integration and certification will be supported by the NRC and/or the CSA.” It is unclear to us what (if any) flight costs should be included in the budget or not.

Answer 39: No, the costs related to the flight and services offered by NRC or CSA should not be included in the budget. However, all other costs of the project related to the project team preparation, travel, accommodation should be included in the budget.

Question 40: Can a large animal study be funded with this grant? We are developing a new medical technology and would like to use CSA FAST funds to support experiments with this technology on parabolic flights, as well as in large animal models (in lab on the ground), which will be necessary before using the technology on humans.

Answer 40: CSA cannot give any comment or additional information regarding the eligibility of a project at this time. This AO is a competitive process, and the eligibility of the projects is part of the evaluation criteria.

Question 41: Is the team capped at 6 members (i.e.,1 PI and 5 co-investigators)?

Answer 41: No, the number of the team members is not limited at six. The applicant can add as many members as needed to present the team.

Question 42: The PI and CO-PIs are required to submit letters of support. What exactly are these letters suppose to address (their content)?

Answer 42: As a minimal requirement, the letters of support from CO-Is should include the name of the organization where the CO-I is working in relation to the project objectives, the confirmation that the CO-I supports the project and the role or expertise that they commit to the project.

Question 43: For the FAST AO, applicants are asked to submit names of potential reviewers. Many of the co-applicants have collaborated with others on authorship in papers, grants, etc. I wanted to confirm with CSA if including such reviewers is allowed, and if so, if there is a period over which there cannot have been any recent interaction? NSERC's definition does not preclude using reviewers with whom applicants have collaborated, so long as they satisfy certain criteria. Is it the same for CSA?

Answer 43: Yes, the applicants may propose reviewers with whom they have collaborated if there is no real, perceived, or potential conflict of interest between the Co-I duties and responsibilities regarding the Review Process, and a Co-I's private, professional, business, or public interests. Such a conflict may arise when the Co-I:

  • would receive professional or personal benefit resulting from the funding opportunity or application being reviewed;
  • has a professional or personal relationship with a PI or with the PI's institution;
  • has a direct or indirect financial interest in a funding opportunity or application being reviewed.
Question 44: Can funds from a successful proposal be distributed from the grant recipient to Co-Is at different institutions to pay trainees?

Answer 44: The redistribution of the funds is not permitted under this AO. However, the project can fund the participation of a Co-I or students if these costs are direct expenses and fall under one eligible category presented in Section 6.2 of the AO (e.g., travel, consultant services, salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students, etc.).

Question 45: Are PIs allowed to provide any support to co-investigator teams at other Canadian universities listed on the proposal through university sub-awards?

Answer 45: No, under this AO, the redistribution of funds (sub-awards) is not acceptable. All expenses should be direct and eligible expenses that are associated with the delivery of the approved project.

Question 46: Are PIs able to fund co-investigator travel expenses, or stipends for graduate students who will be working on the proposed project with a co-investigator at a Canadian university?

Answer 46: The project can fund the travel expenses or stipends for the students registered in a Canadian university (they are eligible expenses as per AO - Section 6.2), if they are direct expenses that are associated with the delivery of the approved project and that are required to achieve the expected results of the project. Please note that the redistribution of the funds is not acceptable under this AO.

Question 47: Are FAST proposals allowed to include scientists at federal government research labs as co-investigators?

Answer 47: Yes, the scientists at the federal government research labs are accepted as co-investigators under this AO.

Question 48: Will the FAST opportunity be published again next year? Or the year after? Some researchers have ideas that are not fully developed yet and are curious if there will be another opportunity to apply next year.

Answer 48: The CSA aims to publish the FAST AOs in most predicable way and it has the intention to continue to publish an AO every two years as it did since the first FAST AO in . However, no proposal should be developed based on the previous publications of the AO, since modifications are made for each iteration.

Question 49: For the projects involving other universities or institutions, should the application provide letters of support from the partner universities/ institutions, besides the letters of support from the Co-Is?

Answer 49: No, for this AO, letters of support from the partner institutions / universities are not required.

Question 50: If a project is submitted under the Category B stream, would use of a high-fidelity simulation package that simulates the space environment, including satellites, space debris etc., satisfy the simulated space environment requirement for Category B projects?

Answer 50: At this stage in the process, CSA cannot comment on the proposal's eligibility. It is the applicant's responsibility to ensure that their project is eligible as per criteria in sections 3.2 and 3.3.

Question 51: Is there a page limit for the CVs and letters of support? A letter of support is needed for each co-investigator. Is this true even if there are multiple co-investigators from the same institution/organization?

Answer 51: No, there is no page limit for the CV's and for the letters of support. As per Section 4.1 of the AO, a complete application requires a letter of support from each Co-I. The letters of support from the institutions / universities are not required.

Question 52: The FAQ (Question 28) mentioned that NRC collaborators can receive CSA funds under one of eligible expenses. As they were not identified as “eligible recipients”, what is the criteria for a collaborator to receive CSA funds?

Answer 52: For this AO, the eligible recipients are the Canadian post-secondary institutions who will receive the entire funding following the signature of the grant agreement. The eligible cost categories that an eligible recipient can incur as direct costs to achieve the objectives of the project are listed in the Section 6.2; a collaborator in the project or a services or goods provider can receive funds under one of these categories (e.g., Salaries and benefits paid to persons other than eligible students, Consultant services, etc.).

Question 53: In the terms and conditions of the FAST AO , it is mentioned that overheads (administrative costs) are part of eligible costs and that they should represent no more than 10% of eligible costs. I'd like to confirm whether this percentage is different in the case of university applications, and whether this amount must be included in the amount requested by the researcher, or whether it is added to the amount awarded (for example, the researcher requests the maximum of $500,000 and receives an additional $50,000 in overheads, which revert to the university).

Answer 53: The limit of the general (administrative) expenses is the same for all eligible beneficiaries. These administrative costs must be included in the total amount requested. Under no circumstances the funding requests should exceed the maximum for each category (see section 3.2, Eligible projects).

Question 54: For the CNES balloons campaigns, if I understand correctly then, Fine Pointing is not available. What other options might a PI have for arcsecond-accuracy pointing? Might an add-on sensor be possible? Also, are night-time launches (for astronomical observations) possible?

Answer 54: The gondola offered by CSA/CNES cannot achieve arcsecond-accuracy pointing. It may be possible for a payload to add their own secondary pointing system to try to achieve this level of accuracy. Yes, it is possible to launch and fly at night.

Question 55: We would like to request a copy of the CSA facilities overview descriptions documents in support of our bid to these facilities (like David Florida Laboratory-DFL).

Answer 55: Appendix B of the AO describes the CSA facilities available to any Canadian organization interested in obtaining access. The teams of the projects selected for funding will meet the CSA to confirm all the details. In the case of DFL, the services offered and the technical specifications can be found under the following link: David Florida Laboratory. Please note that DFL services are offered on a fee-for-service basis, and these costs should be included in the amount requested from CSA for funding.

Question 56: Is it possible to extend the deadline for submitting an application?

Answer 56: No, the deadline for submitting the applications will not be extended.

Appendix A – Additional information on projects

In this section
  1. Canadian students
  2. Training plan
  3. Additional information on end-to-end space-like mission projects (for Funding under Category A – see Section 6.1)
  4. Eligible suborbital/orbital platforms, research sites and ground-based infrastructure (for Funding under Category A - see Section 6.1)
  5. Examples of sites, infrastructure and instruments for research projects pertaining to life sciences and space health (for Funding under Category A - see Section 6.1)
  6. CSA-facilitated access to research platforms

1. Canadian students

For this AO, Canadian students include:

  • College students;
  • Undergraduate university students;
  • Graduate students (master's and doctorate levels);
  • PDFs.

For the purpose of this AO, the term "Canadian students" refers to all students (including international students) that are registered in a Canadian university or post-secondary institution.

2. Training plan

Applications must include a training plan consisting of the following:

  • Detailed information on project activities in which the students will participate and information on the breakdown of tasks. These activities must suit the academic level of the students involved in the research project;
  • Information on the method or methods that will be used to supervise the students and which will be adapted to the work to be carried out;
  • Information on the knowledge and skills that the students will acquire in some or all of the following fields:
    • Project management (allocation of resources, planning, compliance with budgets);
    • Industrial design;
    • Mechanical, optical or electrical systems engineering;
    • Payload assembly, integration, testing and operation;
    • Software development;
    • Data collection and analysis;
    • Interpersonal communications and leadership skills;
    • Problem-solving;
    • Design and implementation of scientific research;
    • Other skills not listed above.

The training level and content should be tailored to the research discipline, whether science- or engineering-related, and include opportunities to interact and collaborate with other researchers within or outside the educational institution, as applicable.

As outlined in one of the application evaluation criteria, the CSA strongly encourages collaborative research activities involving academia, industry, and foreign researchers. In collaborative research activities involving industry, HQP training may be enhanced by exposing them to an industrial work environment. Similarly, industry personnel may benefit from being involved in academic research.

3. Additional information on end-to-end space-like mission projects (for Funding under Category A – see Section 6.1)

It is mandatory to submit an end-to-end space-like mission project proposal under Funding Category A. An end-to-end space-like mission project includes the following activities:

  • Planning, management and operation of a project or space-like mission;
  • Feasibility assessment;
  • Technical requirements definition, design, assembly, integration and testing of innovative technologies or instruments that show promise for future space missions;
  • Commissioning, calibration and validation of the technology;
  • At least one airborne, space-based or ground-based campaign aimed at least one of the following:
    • Demonstrating the technical capabilities of the instruments;
    • Demonstrating the scientific or operational value of the new observations;
    • Enhancing the scientific understanding of the observed processes;
  • Flight operations and technology recovery, or field deployment or research site management;
  • Activities related to data collection and analysis.

4. Eligible suborbital/orbital platforms, research sites and ground-based infrastructure (for Funding under Category A - see Section 6.1)

The following suborbital/orbital platforms, research sites or ground-based infrastructure will be considered for the implementation of projects in Canada or abroad:

4.1 Suborbital/orbital platforms

  • Stratospheric and/or high-altitude balloons;
  • Airplanes, helicopters and/or drones;
  • Aircraft conducting parabolic flights;
  • Rockets;
  • Sounding rockets;
  • Nanosatellites or CubeSats;
  • Suborbital Reusable Launch Vehicles (SRLV) (e.g., commercially developed reusable space vehicles that may carry humans or cargo).

4.2 Research sites

  • Analogue sites that replicate some features and/or conditions that could be found on Mars, the Moon, or on other planetary bodies and asteroids;
  • Laboratories or institutions that are suitable for research relevant to human spaceflight.

4.3 Ground-based infrastructure

  • Terrestrial prototypes of stationary or mobile surface structures for planetary exploration (e.g., planetary rovers, landers);
  • Astronomical observatory infrastructure;
  • Remote sensing infrastructure located in a remote environment;
  • Microgravity simulation infrastructure;
  • Scientific instruments similar to those on board a spacecraft;
  • Environmental test chambers, including those simulating the pressure, temperature, humidity, wind, atmospheric composition and/or regolith of planetary bodies;
  • Health monitoring instruments or infrastructure that simulate certain components or conditions of human spaceflight (e.g., isolation and confinement, extra-vehicular activity (EVA), operational environment, living and working conditions);
  • Radiation facilities.

Other ground-based infrastructure will be considered, as long as they are used in the context of an eligible project that is in line with the CSA priorities outlined in Section 3.3 of this AO.

If the project includes the use of a flight, of fieldwork, of infrastructure, or of scientific or data analysis instruments, the project description should describe any mitigation measures that will be undertaken to address the risk associated with the non-availability of those elements, as well as the impact on the achievement of the project.

5. Examples of sites, infrastructure and instruments for research projects pertaining to life sciences and space health (for Funding under Category A - see Section 6.1)

Examples of sites, infrastructure and instruments for research projects pertaining to the use of space to address health problems on Earth:

  • Suborbital platforms and instruments:
    • Studies using small animalsFootnote 1 (such as nematodes), cells or microorganisms;
  • Ground-based infrastructure and instruments simulating a microgravity environment:
    • Drop-towers, human or animal centrifuges;
    • Microgravity simulation using rotating wall bioreactors (RWBs) or clinostats:
      • Relevant microbial, cellular or whole-animal based research;
    • Animal models of unloading:
  • Isolated, remote field stations or similar environments that are analogs of spaceflight, and that can be used to study Earth Health topics

For Co-Is of international proposals (proposals submitted to non-Canadian space agencies and organizations), the allowed platforms are the same as above, with the addition of the ISS, with the understanding that CSA resources on the ISS cannot be used.

6. CSA-facilitated access to research platforms

Through this AO, the CSA is soliciting applications that may require the use of suborbital or other research platforms. Applicants may request CSA-facilitated access to the following research platforms:

  1. Access through the CSA to the Centre national d'études spatiales (CNES) stratospheric balloons;
  2. Access through the CSA to the National Research Council Canada (NRC)'s Falcon 20 aircraft for reduced gravity flights;
  3. Access to some CSA infrastructure and facilities, pending availability, at the CSA in St-Hubert for field investigations.

Additional information regarding these opportunities are described in Appendix B.

Please note:

  • If a proponent requests, as part of the proposal, access to and/ or use of the resources above (including facilities, equipment, technical expertise), an additional agreement might have to be signed between the CSA and the recipient, provided that the proposal has been selected for funding.
  • Applicants are encouraged to collaborate with other government departments in order to carry out their projects.

Appendix B - Access to research platforms

In this section
  1. Access through the CSA to the CNES stratospheric balloons
  2. Access, through the CSA, to NRC Falcon 20 aircraft for reduced gravity flights
  3. Access to CSA infrastructure and facilities in Saint-Hubert, Quebec for field investigations

1. Access through the CSA to the CNES stratospheric balloons

In and again in , scientists recommended that the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) establish an active and sustainable Canadian balloon program with regular yearly flight opportunities. This has been achieved through a ten-year agreement that was signed in with the Centre National d'Études Spatiales (CNES) to jointly conduct stratospheric balloon flights from Canada.

The CSA has invested in the construction of a launch base in Timmins, Ontario allowing CNES to launch its balloons from Canada. In exchange, CNES provides annual flight opportunities for Canada, from the domestic base of Timmins and abroad.

Building on their successful partnership, both organizations renewed the ten-year agreement in during the International Astronautical Congress (IAC) in Paris. As part of this second agreement, the CSA has invested in new dedicated infrastructures for scientists and balloon operators.

Selected grant recipients will be allowed to launch their instruments on these balloons as part of the CSA's STRATOS program. The altitude of stratospheric balloons typically ranges between 18 and 42 km, depending on mission objectives, payload specifications and weather conditions. Possible balloon launch sites include the following: Timmins, Ontario (mid-latitude); Kiruna, Sweden (Arctic); and Alice Springs, Australia (South Hemisphere mid-latitude). CNES has started investigating the possibility of developing a new launch site in Tocantins, Brazil (equatorial latitude) beyond . The balloon launch site, also named balloon campaign when including several flights, is decided by CNES based on their needs and is expected to be in Kiruna, Sweden in and Timmins, Ontario in . Launch locations are still to be confirmed for subsequent years with the possibility of being in Brazil in if the site is ready.

CNES Zero-Pressure Balloon

Stratospheric balloon launched from the base in Timmins, Ontario

Text version of the Stratospheric balloon launched from the base in Timmins, Ontario

Stratospheric balloon launched from the base in Timmins, Ontario. (Credit: CSA)

During a launch campaign, multiple balloons are launched. All launches can accommodate either a single primary payload, multiple secondary payloads or both. Consequently, applicants will be considered for either a primary slot or a secondary slot, depending on their payload's mass and volume. Typically, a primary payload can weigh up to 800 kg, and a secondary payload can weigh up to 100 kg.

For primary payloads greater than 400 kg, grant recipients may be required to provide their own gondola to accommodate their payload. If that is the case, neither the CNES nor the CSA will be responsible for providing such a gondola, including the structure and pointing systems. However, the CSA and the CNES can provide the telemetry and telecommunications subsystem (the CNES PASTIS communication system downlink is limited to 1400 kbit/s) that will allow the payload communications system to send data to the ground and uplink commands. In some cases, the CSA can also provide a primary payload with a power subsystem (unregulated, 28 V nominal), including battery packs and a power distribution capacity.

In the case of secondary payloads, the recipient must provide a self-contained payload that will not interfere with the primary payload. Secondary payloads will be accepted depending on the volume, mass and power available on board the gondola. Although power and communications subsystems can be provided by the gondola, there may be special cases where payloads would need to supply their own power. These will be assessed on a case-by-case basis. The total communications downlink bandwidth allocation (1400 kbit/s) will be shared by all of the payloads onboard. All primary and secondary payloads flying with the CSA/CNES balloons can use the provided CSA uPRISM system for in-flight position and attitude knowledge. Post-flight position and attitude knowledge may also be shared with recipients upon their request.

Once a grant is obtained for a STRATOS balloon flight, the recipient must fill out a questionnaire providing additional information on its payload, the flight requirements and constraints, and payload hazards. The recipient will subsequently be responsible for ensuring that its payload and its gondola (if applicable) will be ready on time for the given flight window. Payload safety and interface requirements, which are outlined in the CNES User Manual, will be provided to the recipient. Payloads must meet all requirements in order to fly, and any deviations or non-compliance must be reviewed and approved by the CSA and/or CNES in advance of the flight. The recipient will follow the CSA's payload certification process, which includes submitting an Experiment Safety Data Package along with a Requirements Compliance Matrix, Hazard Sheets and a Safe Recovery Procedure, in order to get flight certification and approval for the flight. The CSA will carry out an internal technology assessment several months before a balloon campaign to confirm whether or not a proposed payload is ready for the flight.

The CSA will do its utmost to fly all FAST grant recipient payloads that meet the payload requirements, and that are compatible with STRATOS balloon campaign plans and schedule.

Applicants interested in utilizing a STRATOS balloon flight must clearly state so in their application and provide information on their payload as well as their flight preferences (such as period of the year for a flight, launch site, required flight profile and the expected support required by the CNES and the CSA). However, the CSA cannot guarantee a flight at the location, period of the year or time of day stated in a recipient's application.

Expenses associated with a STRATOS balloon launch, flight operations and payload recovery will be supported by the CSA An additional agreement might have to be signed between the CSA and the recipient, provided that the proposal has been selected for funding.

For general information on the CSA's balloon program, please refer to the Stratospheric balloons Web page.

To obtain a copy of the Stratospheric Balloon User Manual, please send a request to: stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca. This document is subject to change at any time. Notice of such changes will be sent only to organizations that would have officially requested a copy of the document.

2. Access, through the CSA, to NRC Falcon 20 aircraft for reduced gravity flights

As a result of collaboration with the NRC, the CSA has access to the NRC's Falcon 20 aircraft in Ottawa. Consequently, selected grant recipients will also be given access to a reduced gravity environment for experimentation. The Falcon 20 will be able to produce multiple short periods of near zero-g acceleration force. Lunar-g and Martian g can also be simulated using this aircraft.

Depending on the physical properties of the experiment, the Falcon 20 can accommodate multiple payloads and experimenters on board. The Falcon 20 aircraft is also equipped to provide electrical power and a data acquisition system for the payloads. In addition, work space is available on the ground for build-up and checkout of test equipment prior to installation in the aircraft.

It is the grant recipient's responsibility to comply with all safety procedures, and to ensure that the payload will be ready on time and meets safety and interface requirements, which are outlined in the Falcon 20 user manual available upon request. The CSA and the NRC will do their utmost to accommodate all of the experiments to be selected following the NRC's multi stage approval and review procedure.

Expenses associated with the flight and the engineering support required from the CSA and the NRC for payload integration and certification will be supported by the NRC and/or the CSA. To better manage the cost of this support, CSA may limit to one flight campaign opportunity for each approved FAST project. An additional agreement might have to be signed between the CSA and the recipient, provided that the proposal has been selected for funding.

Applicants interested in utilizing the NRC Falcon 20 aircraft must clearly state so in their application.

To obtain a copy of the Falcon 20 User Manual, please send a request to stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca.

3. Access to CSA infrastructure and facilities in Saint-Hubert, Quebec for field investigations

In order to facilitate the ground testing and demonstration of planetary exploration technologies, and to support field investigations to prepare Canada for future planetary exploration missions, the CSA has developed infrastructure and facilities for testing, integrating and operating planetary exploration systems and equipment, such as rovers and scientific instruments, in a "mission-like" planetary environment. The facilities include integration labs, test facilities, a planetary analogue site (located at the CSA), a control center and the communications infrastructure necessary to connect various on-site facilities.

The CSA is making available to grant recipients, subject to availability, its outdoor facilities and infrastructure to support the testing, integration and operation of planetary exploration systems and equipment (e.g. rovers, instruments, payloads).

Applicants interested in using CSA facilities must clearly state so in their application and provide information on their rover, instrument or payload as well as their schedule. However, the CSA cannot guarantee that a specific facility will be available at the location, period of the year or time of day stated in a recipient's application. The application must also mention the risks and mitigation measures if the requested CSA facilities and resources cannot be made available.

3.1 Use of CSA infrastructure or facilities on site in Saint-Hubert, Quebec

The CSA will provide, subject to availability, expert engineering and technical staff resources to operate the CSA-provided facilities and infrastructure, and support the recipients while on site at the CSA.

The CSA will provide information that grant recipients will need to ensure that the CSA facility interfaces (e.g. WiFi communications infrastructure, power outlets) are well understood in order to accommodate the grant recipient's rovers, instruments or payloads.

3.1.1 Process

Once a project has been selected, the CSA organizes a technical meeting (teleconference) during which the applicant will have to provide additional technical information on its rover, instrument or payload and the field investigation requirements relative to its use of CSA facilities and infrastructure. The applicant will subsequently be responsible for ensuring that its equipment will be ready on time and meets CSA safety and interface requirements, which will be provided by the CSA upon request.

The preliminary schedule provided in the application must include target dates for the demonstration of capacities (deployment) and a preparedness review, to have been carried out four weeks prior to the deployment. The CSA will do its utmost to accommodate all FAST selected applicant requests that meet CSA health and safety (H&S), security and interface requirements, and that are compatible with ongoing CSA plans and schedule for use of its facilities and infrastructure and technical support resources.

Users of CSA facilities (e.g. Analogue Terrain) will be sent facility-specific H&S plan(s) prior to their arrival. All participants will be asked to respond with an email stating that they have read, understood and will comply with the H&S requirements.

CSA badging will be arranged prior to arrival. Depending on the length of visit and frequency of trips to the CSA, either a visitor's badge (escort required) or a CSA access badge (no escort required) will be issued upon arrival. For CSA Visitor Badges, Canadians must show ID (e.g. driver's license) and non-Canadians must show ID + a student/work visa + a passport). For CSA access badges, a government security check will be done, including fingerprinting and a form to be filled out and submitted approximately two weeks prior to the visit.

3.1.2 Agreement

An agreement must be signed between the CSA and the recipient in order to have access to CSA infrastructure and facilities. This agreement will include, among other things, clauses relating to the following:

  • Location (infrastructure and facilities to be used) and supervision of the recipient's participants;
  • Access to CSA facilities (H&S, security);
  • Confidential information (information handling);
  • Intellectual property (background and foreground);
  • Indemnification and liability; and
  • Other clauses as applicable.
3.1.3 Expenses

All expenses associated with the recipient's rover, instrument or payload development, testing, integration and shipping, as well as travel and accommodation before, during and after the field investigation activity, are the grant recipient's responsibility.

3.2 CSA facilities overview descriptions

The following Sections (3.2.1, 3.2.2 and 3.2.3) provide a summary description of the CSA's facilities.

In order to provide as much information as possible for the AO release date, the following CSA documents are also being made available on a per-request basis and in an "as-is" state. In some cases, the information contained does not reflect with 100% accuracy the current configuration of the facilities, as some upgrades may have occurred since the documents were prepared. However, the information supplied should be sufficient to provide the applicant with an understanding of the available functionality, capability and general interfaces. Available documentation is listed below:

  • CSA Facility Overview Sheets:
    • Analogue Terrain (AT);
    • Portable Command and Control Shelter (PCCS);
    • Exploration Storage Facility (ESF);
  • CSA AT User Guide/Manual; and
  • CSA Facility H&S Plans:
    • AT;
    • PCCS;
    • ESF;

To obtain copies of these documents, please send a request to stedia-dstemu@asc-csa.gc.ca.

3.2.1 Analogue terrain (AT)

The CSA-located AT is a 60- x 120-metre outdoor facility offering various surface features and topographies to simulate the planetary surface, such as rock bed, crater, summit, and flag stone patch. This facility is also equipped with situation awareness cameras and WIFI network for the needs of rover and instrument or payload testing and deployment.

An aerial photo shows the planetary analogue terrain located at the CSA

Text version of an aerial photo that shows the planetary analogue terrain located at the CSA

An aerial photo shows the planetary analogue terrain located at the CSA. (Credit : CSA)

3.2.2 Portable Command and Control Shelter (PCCS)

This infrastructure provides a controlled and secure environment for conducting remote analogue site deployments, i.e., a portable "ExDOC", and can be quickly deployed and set up.

It measures approximately 10 m long (including hitch) by 3 m wide by 3 m high.

It is equipped with multiple workstations and satellite and wireless communications equipment.

Credit: CSA

3.2.3 Exploration Storage Facility (ESF)

Co-located with the AT, the ESF provides a sheltered and secure environment in which to store a variety of rovers and science and technology instruments.

The ESF's dimensions are 10.4 m by 7 m with 3.2-m ceiling height, providing over 70 m2 of storage area. It can provide storage for up to 20 rovers.

Credit: CSA

Appendix C – Scoring

In this section
  1. Benefits to Canada and outcomes
  2. Feasibility and risks
  3. Resources
  4. Evaluation score

A numerical score is associated with each criterion. It is strongly recommended that applicants include in their applications information related to each highest score.

1. Benefits to Canada and outcomes

  • Maximum: 45
  • Minimum: 33

1.1. Proposed research

This criterion is used to evaluate the originality of the research and its probable impact and potential to advance knowledge in the field of space science and/or technology, directly or indirectly. This criterion is also used to evaluate whether the research is aligned with the research priorities outlined in Section 3.3 of the AO.

  • Does the research clearly respond to one of the research priorities outlined in Section 3.3 of the FAST AO?
  • Is the research original and of high intrinsic merit?
  • Is the proposed research likely to result in long-term innovations in the field of space science and/or technology? Will the research have broad impact and applications to other fields of study?
  • How new are the current stated objectives of the proposed project, and to what degree will they impact our knowledge of space science and/or technology?

Evaluation Source: Proposal

  • Poor: The research project does not present new concepts and will not contribute to advancement of new knowledge in space science and/or technology. It will not help to achieve one of the research priorities of the FAST AO. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The probable research project findings could advance knowledge in the field of space science and/or technology. The relationship between the research work and one of the research priorities of the FAST AO is weak. The work is derivative of previous work. (Score: 10)
  • Good: The probable research project findings will advance knowledge in the field of space science and/or technology, and could produce benefits in the short and long terms. The research work will contribute to the advancement of one of the research priorities of the FAST AO, it will make use of new or original methods or concepts, and is based on previous work. (Score: 15)
  • Excellent: The probable research project findings will significantly advance knowledge in the field of space science and/or technology, and will produce substantial long-term benefits beyond the immediate field of study. The research work will help considerably to achieve the research priorities of the FAST AO. The research work is outstanding because of its highly innovative or original scientific or technical concepts or methods, and/or builds significantly on previous work. (Score: 20)

1.2. EDI

This criterion evaluates whether the proposal includes a meaningful plan to foster recruitment and engagement of members from designated and marginalized groups in the research team.

  • Does the research project meaningfully engage members of designated and marginalized groups or individuals within the research team through the engagement of students, PDFs, faculty and partners? What measures will be put in place to facilitate access and participation members of designated and marginalized groups or individuals (e.g.: Indigenous people, women, members of visible minorities, persons with disabilities, 2SLGBTQ+, people from socio-economically disadvantaged communities) in the research team?

Evaluation Source: Proposal

  • Poor: No information is provided regarding measures that will be put in place to facilitate access and the participation of designated and marginalized groups or individuals. (Score: 0)
  • Average: One measure is being considered to facilitate access and the participation of designated and marginalized groups or individuals, but the way in which the measure will be put in place lacks detail or is not clearly defined. (Score: 1)
  • Good: One measure to facilitate access and the participation of designated and marginalized groups or individuals will be put in place, is clearly described, and appears feasible. (Score: 3)
  • Excellent: One or more measures to facilitate access and the participation of designated and marginalized groups or individuals are very detailed described and will likely allow for equitable access to the development opportunity. The proposal demonstrates that efforts have already been made to integrate designated and marginalized groups or individuals in this or previous project teams led by the same PI. (Score: 5)

1.3. Training plan

This criterion is used to evaluate the quality, relevance and clarity of the training plan, as well as the impact of the knowledge and experience that the students will acquire.

  • Does the training plan specify the activities or projects in which the students will participate during the research project?
  • Do the training activities suit the academic level of the students involved in the project?
  • Is information provided on the method or methods that will be used to supervise the students?
  • Will the students gain knowledge and experience that is relevant to the developmnt of their professional careers (e.g. benefit from industry participation in the project, internships in industry, etc.)?

Evaluation source: Proposal

  • Poor: The training plan is poorly defined and contains few details on the activities or projects in which the students will participate, and on the distribution of tasks. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The training plan is partially defined, and details are missing on the activities or projects in which the students will participate, and on the distribution of tasks. Overall, the activities or projects suit the academic level of the students involved in the project (undergraduate, Master's, PhD, etc.). There is little information provided on the method that will be used to supervise the students. (Score: 10)
  • Good: The training plan is well-designed and provides detailed information on the activities or projects in which the students will participate, and on the distribution of tasks. The activities or projects suit the academic level of the students involved in the project (undergraduate, Master's, PhD, etc.). The methods for supervising the students are described and suited to the work to be carried out. Detailed information is provided on the knowledge and skills that the students may acquire. (Score: 15)
  • Excellent: The training plan is well-designed and describes in great detail the activities or projects in which the students will participate, and on the distribution of tasks. The activities or projects suit the academic level of the students involved in the project (undergraduate, Master's, PhD, etc.). The methods for supervising the students are clearly described and well-suited to the work to be carried out. A lot of detailed information is provided on the knowledge and skills that the students will acquire and the impact on the students. The students will gain knowledge and experience that is relevant to the development of their professional careers (e.g., benefit from industry participation in the project, internships in industry, etc.). (Score: 20)

2. Feasibility and risks

  • Maximum: 25
  • Minimum: 17

2.1. Research plan and schedule

This criterion is used to evaluate the clarity, completeness and feasibility of the research plan, with the duties and responsibilities, contributions and level of involvement of each team member clearly identified. The criterion is also used to evaluate the likelihood that the work will be completed on schedule.

  • Is the project methodology clearly described, including specifically the project schedule?
  • In light of the proposed research plan, are the objectives realistic? Is there a good probability that the work will be carried out on schedule and within budget?
  • Are the duties and responsibilities of each team member clearly outlined? Is each team member's contribution towards achievement of the project objectives clearly defined and justified?
  • Are the project management structure and decision-making process described?

Evaluation source: Proposal, Detailed implementation schedule

  • Poor: The research plan is poorly defined and/or there is a high likelihood that the objectives will not be met because of any or a combination of the following: inappropriate methods; duties and responsibilities of team members poorly defined; incomplete and/or highly underestimated or overestimated schedule. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The research plan is partially defined and contains shortcomings. The project team's work may comply with the planned schedule, but there are still doubts as to the relevance of the methodology, and the duties and responsibilities of some team members. (Score: 5)
  • Good: The research plan is well-defined. The method is well-described and suited to the work to be carried out. There is a high probability that the work described will be completed on schedule. (Score: 10)
  • Excellent: The research plan is very well-defined. The method is clearly described and well-suited to the work to be carried out. Many details are provided regarding, in particular, the breakdown of the work, scheduled milestones, and the organization of team members' time to carry out the project. There is an excellent probability that the work described will be carried out on schedule and within budget. (Score: 15)

2.2. Project-related risks and mitigation strategies

This criterion is used to evaluate the applicant's analysis of the main risks associated with the project, as well as the mitigation strategies for each risk.

The applicant must carry out an in-depth risk analysis (financial, managerial, environmental, scientific and technical risks). Detailed information must be provided on the availability of resources and risks associated with their non-availability and on mitigation strategies for these risks (degree of uncertainty, particularly with respect to the launch date, access to infrastructure, the launch site, instruments or scientific data, the agreement with the launch services supplier, and collaboration with the industry and foreign research partners).

A risk analysis table must be included in the proposal or in Section 9 of the application form.

  • Has the applicant identified and described in detail the risks associated with the project, including but not limited to, financial, managerial, environmental, scientific and technical risks (particularly access to financial, human and physical resources) and compliance with the project schedule?
  • Are the proposed mitigation strategies for each risk well thought out and realistic?
  • What is the probability of the risks materializing?
  • If applicable, have appropriate mitigation strategies been provided with regards to any unconfirmed sources of funding and/or in-kind contributions?
  • If applicable, have appropriate mitigation strategies been provided with regards to potential delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic?

Note that the evaluation of the risk criterion will be based on whether all risks were identified, whether the impact and probability assessment is realistic, and whether mitigation strategies are appropriate. The project will not be penalized for having high risks or unconfirmed sources of funding, as long as the risks have been identified and mitigation strategies provided are appropriate.

Evaluation source: Proposal and Section 9 of the application form (if applicable)

  • Poor: The application does not mention any of the main risks associated with the project, and does not contain any mitigation strategy, or includes some risks, but the associated mitigation strategies are missing. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The application mentions a few of the main risks and contains mitigation strategies for these risks. The risks are high that the flight, work on the ground, use of the infrastructure or scientific instruments, or the data analysis will not take place as planned. (Score: 4)
  • Good: The main risks (financial, managerial, environmental, scientific and technical risks) and the associated mitigation strategies are described and relevant. Some information is provided to assess the probability of the risks materializing. It is possible to believe in good faith that everything will take place as planned during the period covered by this grant, or that in the case of unforeseen circumstances, the mitigation strategies considered will allow the project to be carried out with respect to flight, fieldwork, use of infrastructure or scientific instruments, or data analysis. (Score: 7)
  • Excellent: The main risks (financial, managerial, environmental, scientific and technical risks) are well-described, and relevant mitigation strategies are proposed for each risk. The information provided to assess the probability of the risks materializing are deemed to be realistic. It is possible to believe in good faith that the flight, fieldwork, use of the infrastructure or scientific instruments, and the data analysis will take place as planned during the period covered by the grant, or in the case of unforeseen circumstances, the mitigation strategies considered will allow the project to be carried out. (Score: 10)

3. Resources

  • Maximum: 30
  • Minimum: 20

3.1. Project team

This criterion is used to evaluate the quality of the project team (PIs, co-investigators or PDFs, as applicable), its combination of expertise, its capacity to carry out the research project, the skills of team members, and the past achievements of team members.

  • Does the project team have demonstrated experience in the field of study concerned?
  • Does the project team have all of the expertise required to undertake the project?
  • Has the project team demonstrated its capacity to manage and carry out similar projects?
  • Are the duties and responsibilities assigned to each project team member consistent with each member's experience and expertise?
  • Is the team made up of experts from various disciplines and educational institutions?

Please note that in evaluating the project team, the CSA reserves the right to take into consideration how the PI managed CSA-funded projects in the past, if applicable (including reporting accuracy and reliability).

Evaluation source: Proposal, Curricula vitae, CSA evaluations of the PI's previous progress and final reports (if applicable)

  • Poor: The project team members do not have experience and/or expertise in the field of study. (Score: 0)
  • Average: The project team members have some experience and some expertise in the field of study. The team members may not have all of the appropriate expertise for the duties and responsibilities that may be assigned to them during the project. (Score: 5)
  • Good: The project team members have demonstrated experience in the field of study. The team is made up of experts from various educational institutions. They have a variety of expertise that will enable them to undertake the proposed project. The team members have demonstrated their capacity to manage and carry out similar projects. The duties and responsibilities assigned to each team member are consistent with each team member's experience and expertise. (Score: 10)
  • Excellent: The project team members have considerable demonstrated experience in the field of study. The team is made up of experts from various educational institutions. They have an excellent variety of multidisciplinary expertise that will enable them to undertake the proposed project. The team members have demonstrated their capacity to manage and complete similar projects. The duties and responsibilities assigned to each team member are consistent with each team member's experience and expertise. (Score: 15)

3.2. Budget, source of funding, physical resources and infrastructure

This criterion is used to evaluate whether the planned budget is adequate to achieve the project's objectives. It also takes the project's various sources of funding into consideration. It is also used to evaluate the timely availability of physical resources (equipment, instruments and/or scientific data) and infrastructure (ground-based infrastructure, suborbital/orbital platform, analogue site).

  • Is the budget realistic and justified in relation to the proposed activities?
  • Will the applicant make a financial contribution or a contribution in kind to the project other than the PI's salary?
  • Will other organizations participate in the project by making a financial contribution or a contribution in kind? Are the contributions described in the proposal and in Sections 13 and 14 of the application form clearly linked to the proposed project activities?
  • Will the physical resources planned for the project and the infrastructure be available in a timely manner?
  • If applicable: Has sufficient information been provided regarding how the proper licenses will be obtained in order to use the research platform?
  • If applicable, have details been provided regarding the access to the ground-based infrastructure, suborbital/orbital platform or research site that will be used, including how the access will be granted and guaranteed?

Note that for the purpose of the FAST AO, "other sources of funding" refers to resources that will be used specifically for the proposed project activities.

Evaluation source: Proposal, Sections 13 and 14 of the application form

  • Poor: There is a clear mismatch between the planned budget and the work associated with the project. The main physical resources or infrastructure that should be required for the project are absent, and nothing indicates that the applicant has a plan for obtaining them. There is no contribution from the applicant (other than the PI's salary) or from other organizations. (Score: 0)
  • Average: Overall, the budget appears to be adequate for the proposed work and a reasonable rationale is provided, but there are still questions about some cost items. There are missing specifications concerning access to some physical resources and infrastructure. There is no contribution from the applicant other than the PI's salary. Other organizations participating in the project plan to make a financial contribution and/or a contribution in kind. (Score: 5)
  • Good: The budget appears to be adequate and reasonable for all components of the proposed work and a good rationale is provided. The physical resources and infrastructure required to achieve the project's goals and objectives are identified and supported by rationales, and their use is properly planned. However, there are still some uncertainties as to their timely availability. The applicant will make a financial or in-kind contribution in addition to the PI's salary. Other organizations participating in the project plan will make a financial or in-kind contribution. Only a few resources (including financial contributions, in-kind contributions, and/or access to research platforms) have been obtained or confirmed to date. (Score: 10)
  • Excellent: The budget appears to be adequate and reasonable for all components of the proposed work and a good rationale is provided. The physical resources and infrastructure required to achieve the project's goals and objectives are identified in detail, supported by rationales, and planned in order to be used efficiently and effectively. The confirmed resources will be available in a timely manner. The applicant will make a financial or in-kind contribution in addition to the PI's salary.. Other organizations participating in the project will make substantial financial or in-kind contributions. Most resources (including financial contributions, in-kind contributions, and/or access to research platforms) have been obtained or confirmed. (Score: 15)

Evaluation score

  • Maximum total: 100
  • Minimum total: 70
Date modified: