– Annual Report to Parliament - Privacy Act
On this page
- Introduction
- Organizational Structure
- Performance for –
- Highlights of the – Statistical Report
- Training and Awareness
- Electronic Tools
- Policies, Guidelines, Procedures and Initiatives
- Summary of Key Issues and Actions Taken with Respect to Complaints or Audits
- Compliance Monitoring
- Material Privacy Breach
- Privacy Impact Assessments
- Disclosure in the Public Interest
- Conclusion
- Delegation Order
- Statistical Report on the Privacy Act
Introduction
In this section
The Privacy Act (the Act) came into effect on .
It extends the present laws of Canada that protect the privacy of individuals with respect to personal information about themselves held by a government institution, and that provide individuals with a right of access to that information.
Pursuant to section 72, the head of every federal institution shall prepare an annual report on the administration of the Act within the institution. The reports are submitted to Parliament at the end of each fiscal year.
This report provides information on the activities of the Canadian Space Agency (CSA) related to the administration of the Act during the – fiscal year.
Mandate of the Canadian Space Agency
To provide a better understanding of the context in which the Act is implemented at the CSA, this section gives an overview of the CSA's objectives and activities.
The CSA reports to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. Its mandate, as set out in the Canadian Space Agency Act, is "to promote the peaceful use and development of space, to advance the knowledge of space through science and to ensure that space science and technology provide social and economic benefits for Canadians."
Mission
The CSA is committed to leading the development and application of space knowledge for the benefit of Canadians and humanity.
To fulfil its mission, the CSA:
- pursues excellence collectively;
- advocates a client-centred attitude;
- supports employee-oriented practices and open communications;
- commits itself to both empowerment and accountability; and
- pledges to co-operate and work with partners for our mutual benefit.
The CSA has been a source of inspiration for Canadians since its creation in . In addition to consolidating major federal space programs, it coordinates all the components of the Canadian Space Program and manages Canada's major space-related activities.
The new Space Strategy for Canada launched in highlighted the importance of space as a strategic national asset and identified harnessing space science and technology as a priority to solve important issues on Earth. This new plan allowed the CSA to undertake a series of initiatives to support the Canadian space industry so it can take full advantage of the growth in the global space sector, while ensuring that Canada keeps pace.
More information on the CSA's activities can be found at: www.asc-csa.gc.ca.
Organizational Structure
In this section
Delegations of Authority
Under the Act, the head of the CSA is the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development. In , some of the powers under the Act were delegated by the Minister to the incumbents of the CSA positions of Vice-President, Chief Information Officer, and Access to Information and Open Data coordinator. The appended grid on delegation of authorities identifies the powers delegated.
During –, organizational changes were put in place, which resulted in the delegations of authority residing with the positions of the Chief Information Officer and the Access to Information Coordinator. Following these changes in , the Information Management and Technologies Directorate, of which the Office of Access to Information and Personal Information (ATIP) is a part, now reports directly to the president of the CSA.
The updated delegations of authority were approved by the Minister in (see appendix).
The Access to Information and Open Data coordinator is responsible for implementing the Act on a daily basis and reports to the Chief Information Officer.
The Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Office is comprised of the Access to Information and Open Data Coordinator and the Access to Information and Open Data Officer and a junior ATIP officer. In addition, during the year, the ATIP Office was able to benefit from the help of a casual employee in order to compensate for the increase in requests.
This office works closely with all sectors of the CSA to ensure the application of and compliance with the Act.
Lastly, the Act allows government institutions to provide services related to access to information to another government institution presided over by the same minister or under the responsibility of the same minister, or to receive such services themselves from any other such institution. However, at the CSA, no contract for such services, as stipulated in section 73.1 of the Act, has been entered into with any other government institution.
Evolving Role of the ATIP Office
In –, the ATIP Office was mandated not only to process requests under the Act and to report on its administration, but also to implement the Open Government and Open Science initiatives.
Open government is becoming a global priority in improving transparency and making information more readily available to the public. The Government of Canada is no exception in that regard and has implemented a series of commitments in which departments and agencies are taking part. Briefly, the goal is to release as much data and information as possible in a manner that is accessible, interoperable and publicly usable. This vision of transparency is closely linked to the vision for the application of the Act.
Further to a decision to link Access-to-Information and Open Government and open science activities, the ATIP Office has become a one-stop shop for CSA employees wishing to share information and members of the public wishing to obtain information.
This innovative and effective pairing, which resulted from a centralization of activities, has made it possible for the CSA to optimize its acquisition and application of knowledge.
Request Processing Procedure
When it receives a request under the Act, the ATIP Office consults the CSA's office of primary interest and, when necessary and appropriate depending on the case, Justice Canada, the information-related communities of practice, the Treasury Board Secretariat or other institutions.
The ATIP Office uses an electronic ATIP request processing system to record the administrative actions taken, to review the records in question and to apply any exemptions and exclusions.
Once the documents have been analyzed and the consultations held, the ATIP Office recommends the application of the exemptions to the Chief Information Officer of the CSA, who is responsible for approving the communication of documents disseminated under the Act. The records in response to the requests are then sent to the requesters.
Performance for –
During the reporting period, the CSA processed 35 personal information requests. Of the 35 requests processed, 94% received a response within the legislated time limits.
For more details about the processing of the requests, consult the highlights of the statistical report below. The detailed statistical report for the period of , to , can be found in the appendix.
Highlights of the – Statistical Report
In this section
Requests Received and Processed
This year, the number of requests for access to personal information received by the CSA decreased slightly. In fact, the number of requests received was 35 in – and 33 in –, which represents a decrease of 6%.
Of these, the CSA processed 35 requests during the year, including three requests carried over from the previous year, while one request was carried over to the next fiscal year.
The following table illustrates the trend in requests received and carried over during the last five fiscal years:
- | - | - | - | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Carried over from the previous fiscal year | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Received during the fiscal year | 4 | 9 | 13 | 35 | 33 |
Provisions and Processing Times
The Act stipulates that responses to access requests must normally be provided within 30 calendar days. Of the requests processed in –, 28 (80%) were processed within this timeframe, while responses for 7 requests (20%) took more than 30 days.
It is important to note that the Act provides for the extension of processing times for some requests if, for instance, consultations must be held or if processing the requests would interfere with the operations of the government institution (for example, a large volume of requests). This year, consultations were required to process three requests, so they were extended as required by law. So, taking into account the extension cases, 94% of the requests processed by the ATIP Office were answered within the prescribed timeframe.
1 to 15 days |
16 to 30 days |
31 to 60 days |
61 to 120 days |
121 to 180 days |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of requests | 16 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 |
Of the 35 requests processed this year, 7 requests (20%) were disclosed in part, while 16 requests (46%) were fully disclosed. Of the remaining requests, 14% were abandoned by the requesters and 20% had no documents.
The following table presents all the provisions invoked.
All Disclosed |
Disclosed in Part |
No records exist |
Request Abandoned |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Number of requests | 16 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
Exemptions and Exclusions Invoked
For the 7 partially disclosed requests, section 26 (information concerning other individuals) was invoked. In addition, for two of these requests section 27 (professional secrecy and privilege) was also invoked.
The CSA also had to use the Access to Information Act to protect certain information found in a request that contained information relating to reviews and audits.
Format of Information Disclosed
Of the 23 requests that were answered this year, a total of 21 disclosures (91%) were made electronically, while one request (4%) was disclosed in paper format and another (4%) was been delivered by hand.
Pages Reviewed and Disclosed
The number of pages disclosed can vary considerably from year to year, depending on the subject of the requests and the amount of relevant documents held by the CSA.
The increase in the number of requests processed in –, however, did not translate into an increase in the average number of pages disclosed. In –, an average of 161 pages disclosed per request, while this year the average of pages disclosed is 134.
The number of pages processed during the year also increased and represented additional complexity for the ATIP Office. A total of 4,802 pages were processed, compared to 4,391 the previous year.
A total of 19 requests contained less than 100 pages, two requests were between 101 and 500 pages, one request between 501 and 1,000 pages, and finally, a single request required processing over 1,000 pages.
The following table illustrates the fluctuation in the number of pages disclosed over the last five years:
- | - | - | - | - | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of pages | 3,081 | 3,538 | 1,280 | 5,347 | 337 |
Consultations and Extensions
This year, three requests were extended under paragraph 15 (a) (ii) - consultation. These three requests required consultations with other federal institutions, other organizations or legal services. Note that the same request may require consultations with more than one category.
The applicants for each of these requests have been notified of the extension of time, as specified by law.
Consultations Received from Other Federal Institutions
It is rare for the CSA to receive consultation requests from other government institutions or organizations relating to personal information. In –, the CSA did not receive any such requests.
Administration Fees and Costs
For the reporting period, operating costs have been estimated at $124,128 for the reporting period. Of this amount, 74% of the costs were dedicated to salary with an amount of $91,346. The cost of goods and services represented 26% ($32,782). These expenses are related to the maintenance of the electronic system to process access requests and to the awarding a contract for a security assessment and authorization in support of a privacy impact assessment, in addition to containing costs related to the purchase of administrative and other supplies.
Impact of COVID‑19
Throughout the year, the CSA has been able to receive and process requests, despite the exceptional situation of COVID-19. Request processing had already undergone a digital transition before the pandemic. This has made it possible to continue processing with teleworking resources. The processing of requests was possible, regardless of the transmission channels, the classification level of information and the format of the documents to be processed.
Training and Awareness
In addition to managing ATIP requests, ATIP Office staff provide CSA employees with guidance and advice on complying with the Act. The guidance and advice are presented in a personalized way based on the requests.
In addition, employees were invited to take the Access to Information and Privacy Fundamentals course (I015) given by the Canada School of Public Service, through its corporate calendar of mandatory and optional training. A total of eight learners took the training this year.
Information sessions on processing Access to Information requests and awareness sessions on record marking at the CSA were also available upon request. However, none of those sessions were given in –.
Electronic Tools
The CSA continues to use the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) ATIP Online Request Service (AORS) to receive these requests. During –, ATIP Office participated in training and testing for TBS's new ATIP Online Access Management Tool (AOMT). The implementation of this tool is expected to occur in –, the CSA is awaiting instructions on this.
Following the commissioning of a new access to information request management system during –, the ATIP Office was able to benefit from this system all year round, which facilitated the reporting and tracking of access to information requests.
Policies, Guidelines, Procedures and Initiatives
The CSA's policies, guidelines and procedures for the administration of the Privacy Act are published on its intranet. In –, no changes were made to these documents.
Summary of Key Issues and Actions Taken with Respect to Complaints or Audits
No complaints were received by the CSA in –.
Compliance Monitoring
The time spent on processing requests is tracked through the electronic ATIP request processing system. For related CSA reporting purposes, reports, including a weekly report, are sent to senior management and others involved in the requests.
Material Privacy Breach
A privacy breach involves improper or unauthorized collection, use, disclosure, retention or disposal of personal information. In –, there were no material privacy breaches.
Privacy Impact Assessments
All government institutions that are subject to the Act and that create, sponsor or fund programs, projects or initiatives involving the collection, use or sharing of personal information, are responsible for conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment. The Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) Directive on Privacy Impact Assessment supports institutions such as the CSA in this activity.
The CSA drafted two PIAs during –. The help of contract agency employees was required for these assessments. A first evaluation looked at the CSA Junior Astronaut Campaign, while a second evaluated a new set of recruiting and hiring tools via video. At the end of the – fiscal year, these two assessments were still ongoing and were due for approval in –.
Disclosure in the Public Interest
Section 8(2)(m) of the Privacy Act allows the head of a government institution to disclose personal information without the consent of the individual concerned where, in his opinion, there are grounds for public interest would clearly justify a possible invasion of privacy, or where it is clearly in the best interests of the individual to do so. During the reporting period, the CSA made only one disclosure of personal information in accordance with this provision. A disclosure notice was sent to the Office of the Privacy Commissioner after their information was disclosed.
Conclusion
Through its ATIP Office, the CSA will continue its mandate to respond to all requests for access to personal information in accordance with the spirit and letter of the Act. Its mandate will also include the dissemination of data and information as part of the Open Government and Open Science initiatives.
Delegation Order
Approved in
Canadian Space Agency
Access to Information Act and Privacy Act Delegation Order
The Minister of Industry, pursuant to subsections 95(1) of the Access to Information Act and 73(1) the Privacy Act, hereby designates the persons holding the positions set out in the schedule hereto, or the persons occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers and functions of the Minister as the head of a government institution, under the section of the Acts set out in the schedule opposite each position. This Delegation Order supersedes all previous Delegation Orders
Schedule
Position | Access to information Act and Regulations | Privacy Act and Regulations |
---|---|---|
Chief Information Officer | Full authority | Full authority |
Coordinator Access to Information and Open Data | Full authority | Full authority |
Dated, at the City of Ottawa
This
François-Philippe Champagne
Minister of Industry
Approved in
Canadian Space Agency
Access to Information Act and Privacy Act Delegation Order
The Minister of Industry Canada, pursuant to section 73 of the Access to Information Act and the Privacy Act, hereby designates the persons holding the positions set out in the schedule hereto, or the persons occupying on an acting basis those positions, to exercise the powers and functions of the Minister as the head of a government institution, under the section of the Acts set out in the schedule opposite each position. This Delegation Order supersedes all previous Delegation Orders
Schedule
Position | Access to information Act and Regulations | Privacy Act and Regulations |
---|---|---|
Vice President | Full authority | Full authority |
Chief Information Officer | Full authority | Full authority |
Coordinator ATIP Services | Section: 4(2.1), 7, 8(1), 9, 11(2), (3), (4), (5), (6),12, 25, 26, 27(1), (4), 43,44,71,72 | Section : 8(4), 9(1), (4), 10, 15, 17, 31, 35(4), 72(1) |
Dated, at the City of Ottawa
this
The Honourable Navdeep Singh Bains
Minister of Industry (to be known as Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development)
Statistical Report on the Privacy Act
Name of institution: Canadian Space Agency
Reporting period: to
Section 1: Requests Under the Privacy Act
Description | Number of Requests |
---|---|
Received during reporting period | 33 |
Outstanding from previous reporting period | 3 |
Total | 36 |
Closed during reporting period | 35 |
Carried over to next reporting period | 1 |
Section 2: Requests Closed During the Reporting Period
2.1 Disposition and completion time
Disposition of Requests | Completion Time | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days | Total | |
All disclosed | 5 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 |
Disclosed in part | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
No records exist | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
Request abandoned | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 16 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
2.2 Exemptions
Section | Number of Requests |
---|---|
18(2) | 0 |
19(1)(a) | 0 |
19(1)(b) | 0 |
19(1)(c) | 0 |
19(1)(d) | 0 |
19(1)(e) | 0 |
19(1)(f) | 0 |
20 | 0 |
21 | 0 |
22(1)(a)(i) | 0 |
22(1)(a)(ii) | 0 |
22(1)(a)(iii) | 0 |
22(1)(b) | 0 |
22(1)(c) | 0 |
22(2) | 0 |
22.1 | 0 |
22.2 | 0 |
22.3 | 0 |
22.4 | 0 |
23(a) | 0 |
23(b) | 0 |
24(a) | 0 |
24(b) | 0 |
25 | 0 |
26 | 7 |
27 | 2 |
27.1 | 0 |
28 | 0 |
2.3 Exclusions
Section | Number of Requests |
---|---|
69(1)(a) | 0 |
69(1)(b) | 0 |
69.1 | 0 |
70(1) | 0 |
70(1)(a) | 0 |
70(1)(b) | 0 |
70(1)(c) | 0 |
70(1)(d) | 0 |
70(1)(e) | 0 |
70(1)(f) | 0 |
70.1 | 0 |
2.4 Format of information released
Paper | Electronic | Other |
---|---|---|
1 | 21 | 1 |
2.5 Complexity
2.5.1 Relevant pages processed and disclosed
Number of Pages Processed |
Number of Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
---|---|---|
4802 | 3081 | 28 |
2.5.2 Relevant pages processed and disclosed by size of requests
Disposition | Less Than 100 Pages Processed |
101-500 Pages Processed |
501-1000 Pages Processed |
1001-5000 Pages Processed |
More Than 5000 Pages Processed |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
|
All disclosed | 15 | 162 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1929 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 4 | 148 | 2 | 289 | 1 | 553 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 24 | 310 | 2 | 289 | 1 | 553 | 1 | 1929 | 0 | 0 |
2.5.3 Other complexities
Disposition | Consultation Required | Legal Advice Sought | Interwoven Information | Other | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All disclosed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Disclosed in part | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Request abandoned | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Neither confirmed nor denied | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
2.6 Closed requests
2.6.1 Number of requests closed within legislated timelines
Requests closed within legislated timelines | |
---|---|
Number of requests closed within legislated timelines | 33 |
Percentage of requests closed within legislated timelines (%) | 94.3 |
2.7 Deemed refusals
2.7.1 Reasons for not meeting legislated timelines
Number of Requests Closed Past the Legislated Timelines | Principal Reason | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Interference with Operations / Workload | External Consultation | Internal Consultation | Other | |
2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
2.7.2 Requests closed beyond legislated timelines (including any extension taken)
Number of Days Past Legislated Timelines | Number of Requests Past Legislated Timeline Where No Extension Was Taken | Number of Requests Past Legislated Timelines Where an Extension Was Taken | Total |
---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 days | 1 | 0 | 1 |
61 to 120 days | 0 | 1 | 1 |
121 to 180 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 days | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 1 | 1 | 2 |
2.8 Requests for translation
Translation Requests | Accepted | Refused | Total |
---|---|---|---|
English to French | 0 | 0 | 0 |
French to English | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 3: Disclosures Under Subsections 8(2) and 8(5)
Paragraph 8(2)(e) | Paragraph 8(2)(m) | Subsection 8(5) | Total |
---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Section 4: Requests for Correction of Personal Information and Notations
Disposition for Correction Requests Received | Number |
---|---|
Notations attached | 0 |
Requests for correction accepted | 0 |
Total | 0 |
Section 5: Extensions
5.1 Reasons for extensions and disposition of requests
Number of requests where an extension was taken | 15(a)(i) Interference with operations | 15(a)(ii) Consultation | 15(b) Translation purposes or conversion |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Further review required to determine exemptions | Large volume of pages | Large volume of requests | Documents are difficult to obtain | Cabinet Confidence Section (Section 70) |
External | Internal | ||
3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
5.2 Length of extensions
Length of Extensions | 15(a)(i) Interference with operations | 15(a)(ii) Consultation | 15(b) Translation purposes or conversion |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Further review required to determine exemptions | Large volume of pages | Large volume of requests | Documents are difficult to obtain | Cabinet Confidence Section (Section 70) |
External | Internal | ||
1 to 15 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 days | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
31 days or greater | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Section 6: Consultations Received From Other Institutions and Organizations
6.1 Consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions and other organizations
Consultations | Other Government of Canada Institutions |
Number of Pages to Review |
Other Organizations |
Number of Pages to Review |
---|---|---|---|---|
Received during the reporting period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Outstanding from the previous reporting period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Closed during the reporting period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Carried over to the next reporting period | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6.2 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other Government of Canada institutions
Recommendation | Number of Days Required to Complete Consultation Requests | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Days | More Than 365 Days | Total | |
All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
6.3 Recommendations and completion time for consultations received from other organizations
Recommendation | Number of days required to complete consultation requests | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 to 15 Days | 16 to 30 Days | 31 to 60 Days | 61 to 120 Days | 121 to 180 Days | 181 to 365 Ddays | More Than 365 Days | Total | |
All disclosed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Disclosed in part | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All exempted | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
All excluded | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Consult other institution | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 7: Completion Time of Consultations on Cabinet Confidences
7.1 Requests with Legal Services
Number of Days | Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed |
101-500 Pages Processed |
501-1000 Pages Processed |
1001-5000 Pages Processed |
More than 5000 Pages Processed |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
|
1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
7.2 Requests with Privy Council Office
Number of Days | Fewer Than 100 Pages Processed |
101-500 Pages Processed |
501-1000 Pages Processed |
1001-5000 Pages Processed |
More than 5000 Pages Processed |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
Number of Requests |
Pages Disclosed |
|
1 to 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
16 to 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
31 to 60 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
61 to 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
121 to 180 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
181 to 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
More than 365 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Total | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 8: Complaints and Investigations Notices Received
Section 31 | Section 33 | Section 35 | Court action | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 9: Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA) and Personal Information Banks (PIB)
9.1 Privacy Impact Assessments
Number of PIA(s) completed 0
9.2 Personal Information Banks
Personal Information Banks | Active | Created | Terminated | Modified |
---|---|---|---|---|
- | 54 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Section 10: Material Privacy Breaches
Number of material privacy breaches reported to TBS | 0 |
---|---|
Number of material privacy breaches reported to OPC | 0 |
Section 11: Resources Related to the Privacy Act
11.1 Costs
Expenditures | Amount |
---|---|
Salaries | $88,203 |
Overtime | $3,143 |
Goods and Services
|
$32,782 |
Total | $124,128 |
11.2 Human Resources
Resources | Person Years Dedicated to Privacy Activities |
---|---|
Full-time employees | 0.810 |
Part-time and casual employees | 0.180 |
Regional staff | 0.000 |
Consultants and agency personnel | 0.100 |
Students | 0.000 |
Total | 1.090 |
Note: Enter values to three decimal places.